08:41 <kraftwerk28> Done with implementing kitty's CSI for unerlines. What do you think? http://0x0.st/oSLC.png

08:43 <kraftwerk28> Sad thing is, neovim checks $TERM and if it's not xterm-kitty, it won't spit these sequences, only generic one, which is just straight underline with colour of letter above it

08:46 <dnkl> kraftwerk28: are you sure it also doesn't check terminfo? There's a capability for colored/styled underlines

10:34 <kraftwerk28> dnkl, do I need to edit [this](https://codeberg.org/dnkl/foot/src/branch/master/foot.info) to add the capability?

10:34 <kraftwerk28> nsurses package already adds /usr/share/terminfo/f/foot file, so it should be overriden somehow

10:54 <dnkl> kraftwerk28: the answer to the first question is yes

10:55 <dnkl> the answer to the second question is much longer, for which I'll need a computer to type up...

12:40 <dnkl> kraftwerk28: ncurses' terminfo is the recommended terminfo, for various reasons. Mainly to avoid package collisions. However, the ncurses maintainer only accepts "standard" terminfo capabilities. This excludes a couple of tmux related capabilities "our" terminfo sets

12:40 <dnkl> that

12:41 <dnkl> that's the main reason we _have_ our own terminfo

12:41 <dnkl> however, it is up to distributions to choose which terminfo to package

12:41 <dnkl> some distributions, like arch, provide "our" terminfo in a separate package, renamed to e.g. "foot-extra"

12:42 <dnkl> this allows ncurses' terminfo, and ours, to be installed side-by-side, and the user can choose which one to use by setting "term" in foot.ini

14:50 <kraftwerk28> Ok, that makes sense. I placed compiled terminfo from my PR into ~/.terminfo and it seems to work with kitty underlines and TERM=foot, hope I haven't forgotten any other fields