01:04 <FromGitter> <Blacksmoke16> s/o to `IO::Hexdump`

01:04 <FromGitter> <Blacksmoke16> super slick

09:58 <FromGitter> <jrei:matrix.org> TIL we can make polls in matrix

09:59 <FromGitter> <jrei:matrix.org> Including here, but I have no idea how the bridges will handle it

10:20 <FromGitter> <y8> TIL: `crystal play`

10:55 <FromGitter> <y8> Say I have two possible overloads of the method for ancestors of the type: `foo(first)` and `foo(first, last)`. I need to call method in parent class with`first, last` if there is an overload with matching signature. How can I tell that there is a matching overload?

12:52 <spuun> y8: why not declare a NOOP verson in the parent?

12:53 <spuun> y8: https://play.crystal-lang.org/#/r/cse4

14:09 <FromGitter> <Blacksmoke16> related: https://github.com/crystal-lang/crystal/issues/2549

14:10 <FromGitter> <Blacksmoke16> another option i'd throw out is have the sig like `def foo(first, last = nil)`

15:10 <FromGitter> <y8> @spuun: I need to call only one method, so method knocking is not really an option

15:15 <FromGitter> <y8> @Blacksmoke16: thanks! yes, that seems like my case. Re `foo(first, last=nil)` is my current option, but I don't like that last is nillable, as it requires nil checks

15:16 <FromGitter> <Blacksmoke16> not the end of the world, can delegate to two methods, but use this one just as the entry point

15:17 <FromGitter> <y8> sure, but that's another source of runtime errors

15:17 <FromGitter> <Blacksmoke16> how you figure?

15:17 <FromGitter> <Blacksmoke16> ```if first && last ⏎ self.foo first, last ⏎ else ⏎ self.foo first ⏎ end``` [https://gitter.im/crystal-lang/crystal?at=620fb89741e3293d65fc2c56]

15:17 <FromGitter> <Blacksmoke16> where the def is like `foo(first : String, last : String? = nil)`

15:20 <FromGitter> <y8> last is still optional, so if there is an error in code, you'll only know about that in runtime, where with some kind of arity check, it would throw compile time error

15:22 <FromGitter> <Blacksmoke16> best bet would be two separate methods then, versus overload of the same

15:22 <FromGitter> <Blacksmoke16> then `#responds_to?` would work

15:28 <FromGitter> ... time). It would be much easier for others to provide insights, if you can come up with some sample code on what you are trying to achieve and what is blocking that.

15:28 <FromGitter> <naqvis> > last is still optional, so if there is an error in code, you'll only know about that in runtime, where with some kind of arity check, it would throw compile time error ⏎ ⏎ Question is, if you don't know the contract of class, then only option left is figure that out at run-time via `responds_to?` approach, but that still conflicts with what you are trying to achieve (i.e. triggering error at compile

18:10 <SamantazFox> https://libera.ems.host/_matrix/media/r0/download/pussthecat.org/gAMuRVWlOcIASKXeqNOSXmwv/20220218-190737.92v41ne3.png

18:10 <SamantazFox> Crystal 1.3 is doing some weird network stuff..

18:11 <SamantazFox> It broke the entire video playback (proxying subsystem) of invidious, and I'm still struggling to understand what's going on.

18:14 <FromGitter> <Blacksmoke16> i'd start by seeing if you can reproduce it with a minimal request/program

18:21 <SamantazFox> problem is that I can hardly reduce the code. Changing the server type (e.g testing wil a local server rather than GVS) could change a lot of stuff...

18:21 <FromGitter> <Blacksmoke16> right, and if it still happens you and get more and more reduced

18:22 <FromGitter> <Blacksmoke16> ultimately ideally a small isolated example to show the problem would be helpful. otherwise its unlikely someone can jump into invidious and find/fix it

18:22 <FromGitter> <Blacksmoke16> when its not clear where the problem actually lies

18:24 <SamantazFox> yeah, I don't expect anyone to fix invidious. I've tried to check the difference between crystal 1.2.2 and 1.3.0 to see if anything obvious was changed, but I couldn't find anything related to networking.

18:25 <FromGitter> <Blacksmoke16> id focus on the code making the request as thats seems to be whats strange? or?

18:25 <SamantazFox> the code making the request is Safari on MacOS

18:25 <FromGitter> <Blacksmoke16> same behavior if you make it via curl/postman?

18:26 <SamantazFox> I can't tell, as I need something to parse and play the video data afterwards.

18:29 <SamantazFox> `Connection closed at byte 1046076. Retrying.`

18:34 <SamantazFox> and server says: `copied bytes = 1048576`

19:05 <FromGitter> <Blacksmoke16> :shrug: almost impossible to say whats going on

20:28 <riza> SamantazFox: wireshark, perhaps, or a more sophisticated mitm proxy

20:30 <FromGitter> <Blacksmoke16> could also try replacing the logic that returns the video with one that returns like a static image

20:30 <FromGitter> <Blacksmoke16> and see if it gets corrupted

23:20 <FromGitter> <moe:busyloop.net> sounds like a case for `git bisect` - https://interrupt.memfault.com/blog/git-bisect#the-problem

23:22 <FromGitter> <moe:busyloop.net> possibly time consuming as crystal will need to be compiled a bunch of times. but bisect is designed to minimize the number of steps to find the commit that broke something.