01:51 <ivandi> beerman: i understand your frustration, but what about trimming down contrib

01:51 <ivandi> i am using 67 contrib ports: http://sprunge.us/mZU5FK

01:52 <ivandi> maintaining ports that you are not using daily is like, well, maintaining X w/o running X ;)

06:22 <beerman> ivandi: funny. Still a hard no to your request

06:46 <beerman> also there is no frustration about it. just a clarification that i don't take requests on things you or anyone else likes to have in contrib. if you want it, bring it in yourself. this is how this works

08:39 <jue> beerman: sorry, I forgot to say yesterday: /usr/bin/X seems to be hardcoded in xinit so the symlink Xorg -> X is necessary

08:40 <beerman> jue: can you push a fix for that? I don't run any X session any more

08:40 <jue> just remembered as I read the email from Xavier today

08:41 <jue> yeah, will do

08:41 <beerman> i haven't even read the mail yet

08:41 <beerman> thank you :)

08:46 <beerman> and which mail exactly do you mean? I have none

08:49 <beerman> sysvinit update, as far as i wrote out of their mailing list, is only documentation clean up and some code comment cleanups, no other changes

08:55 <jue> hmm, not in our archive yet

09:49 <beerman> still nothing over here, maybe the mail didn't go to the ml?

09:57 <jue> it's in the archive now -> https://lists.crux.nu/pipermail/crux/2021-September/006983.html

10:05 <beerman> yep, okay

10:08 <beerman> i have never used oldfiles before :D

10:09 <beerman> interesting. I made a cronjob with "find older than x days" basically for that

10:09 <beerman> but of course, oldfiles is a little bit smarter than that

10:10 <beerman> once my ba thesis is through, i'll have more time to play with stuff like that. before that, however, i can't

12:08 <beerman> farkuhar: hi! would you be willing to look at another script in pkgutils for the rename patch to be merged?

12:08 <beerman> https://crux.nu/bugs/index.php?do=details&task_id=923&project=1&pagenum=2

13:06 <stenur> Would someone please stop the terrorist from messing with shitty bug reports?

13:07 <stenur> FS#1886 - qemu/qemu-all: add opt/qemu-doc, let both depend on that

13:07 <stenur> Additional comments about closing: I think this is long done. Reopen if not.

13:07 <stenur> That is just grazy.

14:26 <farkuhar> beerman: hi! Sure, I could look at another script in pkgutils. Which one needs attention?

14:27 <beerman> oldfiles, it's a perl script

14:29 <farkuhar> oldfiles, yes I remember seeing that discussion in yesterday's IRC logs.

14:29 <dlcusa> farkuhar, beerman--oldfiles is part of prt-utils, not pkgutils.

14:31 <farkuhar> dlcusa: thanks. Will check it out later today.

14:34 <beerman> sorry, my error, still heads in on other stuff

14:54 <beerman> i was made aware of something that made me look in the log. steffen, i hope you can understand that i do have you on my ignore list for good reasons

14:55 <beerman> you are making personal assumptions about people and you start name calling. i won't go that far. i don't care about you - at all.

14:55 <beerman> if you have problems, post a ticket. if you think this task was not done - reopen it. It's that simple.

14:56 <beerman> again - i won't be able to read your answers here and i am not looking to talk it out with you. get a grip or don't, i can't care less

15:34 <farkuhar> beerman: it looks like oldfiles is comparing the contents of $PKGMK_SOURCE_DIR and $PKGMK_PACKAGE_DIR with the files listed in .signature for each installed package. Any port that renames its sources will have the new name in its .signature file already, so /usr/bin/oldfiles should work without any modifications.

15:36 <beerman> Perfect! Thank you for the investigating! jue ^

21:45 <stenur> hobby or not, messing things to broken state consciously is so mediocre

22:12 <beerman> jaeger: https://crux.nu/bugs/index.php?do=details&task_id=1792&project=1&status%5B0%5D=open

22:13 <beerman> I guess the question if we actually want that is dependent on if we want to grant this request https://crux.nu/bugs/index.php?do=details&task_id=1793

22:14 <beerman> since you have been fiddling on this part of crux.nu, do you have an opinion on that?

22:15 <beerman> i can imagine that serving ports via git to all users might be more resource hungry than rsync is, I have no actual idea though and I don't see the need to offer them via git myself