ikarso has quit [Quit: Connection closed for inactivity]
Shadyman has joined #beagle
set_ has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
set_ has joined #beagle
aussetg has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
aussetg has joined #beagle
aussetg has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
darkapex has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]
aussetg has joined #beagle
aussetg has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
aussetg has joined #beagle
darkapex has joined #beagle
CrazyEddy has quit [Quit: Reconnecting]
mvaittin has joined #beagle
rob_w has joined #beagle
mvaittin has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]
Shadyman has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
mvaittin has joined #beagle
florian has joined #beagle
ft has quit [Quit: leaving]
xet7 has joined #beagle
mvaittin has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
mvaittin has joined #beagle
starblue has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
starblue has joined #beagle
Stat_headcrabed has joined #beagle
vvn has quit [Quit: WeeChat 4.2.1]
vvn has joined #beagle
mvaittin has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
Stat_headcrabed has quit [Quit: Stat_headcrabed]
SJFriedl has quit [Quit: Leaving]
brook has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
rob_w has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
brook has joined #beagle
<samael> am i safe powering on a beagleplay without antennas plugged? i remember some guy's advice long time ago telling me to avoid powering up wifi hardware without antennas to avoid overheating the rf card or something
_av500_ has joined #beagle
_av500_ is now known as av500
<jakllsch> samael: will be safer to have antennas plugged in
<samael> jakllsch: can you please elaborate on that? i'm curious about the reasons
<jakllsch> reflected radio power can damage the transmit amplifier
<jakllsch> and lack of an antenna causes reflection
<jakllsch> feel free to web search for: radio transmitter no antenna damage
<samael> jakllsch: thanks a lot!
Stat_headcrabed has joined #beagle
xet7 has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
nakbas1 has joined #beagle
ft has joined #beagle
nakbas1 has quit [Quit: nakbas1]
nakbas1 has joined #beagle
nakbas1 has quit [Client Quit]
lucascastro has joined #beagle
lucascastro has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
Stat_headcrabed has quit [Quit: Stat_headcrabed]
xet7 has joined #beagle
brook has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
brook_ has joined #beagle
lucascastro has joined #beagle
lucascastro has quit [Quit: Leaving]
nakbas1 has joined #beagle
jfsimon1981 has joined #beagle
brook has joined #beagle
brook_ has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]
brook has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
nakbas1 has quit [Quit: nakbas1]
brook has joined #beagle
brook has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
brook has joined #beagle
GenTooMan has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
KREYREN has joined #beagle
GenTooMan has joined #beagle
KREYREN has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
KREYREN has joined #beagle
brook has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
brook has joined #beagle
jfsimon1981 has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
brook has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
brook has joined #beagle
renrelkha has quit [Quit: bye]
brook has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
renrelkha has joined #beagle
brook has joined #beagle
SJFriedl has joined #beagle
brook has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
brook has joined #beagle
Guest17 has joined #beagle
Guest19 has joined #beagle
Guest19 has quit [Client Quit]
<Guest17> Hello
<Guest17> I am not that familiar with IRC. So I'll just try to ask my question straight away here. I currently doing some performance measurements on a beaglebone black and notice that the prefetcher is not doing its job (at all?).
<Guest17> Long story short after invalidating the entire cache in kernel space, I traverse a 4k array linearly. While traversing it I get a cache miss at every 64th byte every single time. Not only for the first 128bytes or so. Note that 64 corresponds to the size of a cache line.
<Guest17> I find this very weird as the traversal pattern is purely linear, meaning that after some accesses the prefetcher should be able to predict all the future accesses and therefor prefetch them into cache so that there is no penalty. Yet it doesn't as I consistently get a cache miss at every 64th access.
<Guest17> Why?
<zmatt> Guest17: did you fill that memory before testing, or did you just allocate it but never write anything to it?
<zmatt> Guest17: also please don't send private messages
<zmatt> oh in kernel space, hm
<zmatt> does the cortex-a8 even do prefetching? I don't really remember
<zmatt> I mean, it does instruction prefetching, but I'm honestly not sure it even does any sort of data prefetching at all (except when prompted using a PLD instruction)
brook has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
nakbas1 has joined #beagle
<zmatt> I don't see anything in the Cortex-A8 TRM to suggest that it does
<zmatt> samael: you could instead make sure the rf functions are kept disabled through software or DT, or perhaps terminate the antenna ports with 50 ohm resistors (dunno if u.fl terminators exist though, but maybe)
<zmatt> wait, the cc1352p on the beagleplay is also a 2.4 GHz transmitter, and there's no coexistence signalling between it and the wifi chip? ... that can't be good
nakbas1 has quit [Quit: nakbas1]