19:09 <JustineSmithies> Daft question because I'm maybe not understanding the docs correctly ? Is there a riverctl command that will take the focussed window on one output and move it to the currently focussed output on another output ?

19:11 <JustineSmithies> So say I have a foot terminal on output e-DP1 on tag 1 and wish to use a keybinding that will move it to output HDMI-A-1 which happens to have tag 4 focussed. Is that possible ?

19:12 <JustineSmithies> Or can I only move to the same tag on another output ?

19:12 <JustineSmithies> OMG I do hope someone can make sense of what I've just said ;)

19:15 <sacodya> like, on the fly?

19:16 <JustineSmithies> Yeah so i have a terminal on output 1 tag 1 but want a keybinding that will move it to output 2 but on outputs 2 currently focussed tag

19:16 <JustineSmithies> Would send-to-output -current-tags be what I'm after ?

19:20 <sacodya> Don't know either, I'm pretty new to river and wayland in general. You could have a footclient spawning in HDMI-A-1 always tho

19:21 <JustineSmithies> Thanks anyway, I know I could spawn one there just wondered if there was a way on the fly as you say to move a window on one output to the focussed on another

19:38 <novakane> JustineSmithies: yes I think -current-tags is what you want, I don't have multiple so I'm not 100% sure

19:39 <novakane> but AFAIK send-to-output assign the same tag to the view than the current output and with -current-tags it assigns the focused tags of the output where you send it

19:42 <JustineSmithies> novakane: Thanks I'll go give that a shot.

20:00 <JustineSmithies> That did the trick thank you both x

20:01 <JustineSmithies> leon-p: I should thank you too for implementing the -current-tags option too.

20:05 <leon-p> oh, yeah I guess that was me

20:05 <leon-p> you're welcome <3

20:07 <leon-p> wait

20:08 <leon-p> it wasn't me

20:08 <leon-p> https://github.com/riverwm/river/pull/811

20:08 <JustineSmithies> oops

20:09 <JustineSmithies> Sorry thought it was yourself.

20:10 <JustineSmithies> It's pinpoxIRC I should thank for that x

20:11 <JustineSmithies> It's been a long day and that's my excuse and I'm sticking to it ;)

20:12 <JustineSmithies> I tell you what though I am looking forward to #875 making it in if indeed it does ?

21:22 <ifreund> JustineSmithies: I'm happy merging #875 once my review comments have been addressed, with all the infrastructure we have now it won't me a major maintenence burden :)

21:22 <ifreund> s/me/be/

21:52 <JustineSmithies> ifreund: Cool and thanks for answering too. If they don't ever address your comments how would one go about taking this on without stepping on others toes ? Maybe it's just not correct to do such a thing? I'm still learning but very willing.

21:58 <ifreund> JustineSmithies: generally I'd give the author of the PR a couple weeks to respond and then grab their branch and open a new PR adding your own commits on top and preserving the authorship of their original commits