<cfbolz>
vext01: you need to pick a machine on the left
<cfbolz>
and a benchmark
<vext01>
oh...
<vext01>
that's really not obvious
<vext01>
because it says "loading..."
<vext01>
another guy here at kings thought it has been broken since forever :P
<cfbolz>
vext01: patches welcome ;-)
<vext01>
you don't want my web design skills, trust me :)
<LarstiQ>
this could be one of those "submit something obviously wrong so others will fix it" cases ;)
<Dejan>
:D
<arigato>
cfbolz: don't know how relevant this is, or if I'm out-of-date, but I'm a bit confused by the mentions of HPy in that paper
<arigato>
they are measuring its performance, so I guess they are using the most efficient version, but then this most efficient version doesn't really use handles at all?
<arigato>
but they latch on the word "handles" and cite some other papers about handles, which I don't know how relevant that is
<cfbolz>
arigato: yes, I agree, that is relatively weird
<cfbolz>
there should be two hpy numbers somehow, one for ABI mode, one for API mode
<cfbolz>
arigato: and this is were it's really annoying that we don't have the source, because we can't check ourselves :-(
<arigato>
as long as the source is not published, it won't have any effect except one citation for the authors