NishanthMenon changed the topic of #openocd to: this is the place to discuss all things OpenOCD | Logs: https://libera.irclog.whitequark.org/openocd/
joconor_ has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
joconor has joined #openocd
joconor has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
joconor has joined #openocd
dnm has quit [*.net *.split]
akaWolf has quit [*.net *.split]
Henry_Nguyen_ has quit [*.net *.split]
KindOne has quit [*.net *.split]
zapb_ has quit [*.net *.split]
mithro has quit [*.net *.split]
cambrian_invader has quit [*.net *.split]
jybz has quit [*.net *.split]
NishanthMenon has quit [*.net *.split]
Steffanx has quit [*.net *.split]
KindOne has joined #openocd
akaWolf has joined #openocd
zapb_ has joined #openocd
dnm has joined #openocd
Henry_Nguyen_ has joined #openocd
jybz has joined #openocd
mithro has joined #openocd
NishanthMenon has joined #openocd
Steffanx has joined #openocd
cambrian_invader has joined #openocd
Haohmaru has joined #openocd
zkrx has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]
zkrx has joined #openocd
zkrx has quit [Client Quit]
Hawk777 has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
nerozero has joined #openocd
zkrx has joined #openocd
jn has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds]
jn has joined #openocd
zkrx has quit []
zkrx has joined #openocd
Xogium has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]
Xogium has joined #openocd
WeaselSoup has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]
WeaselSoup has joined #openocd
nerozero has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]
Haohmaru has quit [Quit: saionara]
<gamiee> Hi borneoa___ . Tomas reviewed my patch (I am super happy!), although, Tomas does not like that in TCL script the error printing is disabled to bypass that message: https://review.openocd.org/c/openocd/+/8527/10/tcl/target/bl602_common.cfg#88
<gamiee> Do you think that I should rework it as Tomas suggests? (If yes, I will change it in parent patch, which rewrites Bouffalo TCL script heavily.) Thanks.
ali1234 has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
ali1234 has joined #openocd
<zapb_> gamiee, Tomas comment looks reasonable IMO
<zapb_> Actually the chance that something is accidentally hidden by the debug level modification is quite low but still I think providing a short notice about an invalid memory read/write is better
<gamiee> zapb_ yes, it makes sense. To other side, current way of handling it was suggested to me by Antonio, so I want to know if Antonio still prefers the current way, or what Tomas suggests.
<zapb_> gamiee, I see, it's a matter of taste ;)