mattip has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]
mattip has joined #hpy
mattip has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
mattip has joined #hpy
mattip has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]
mattip has joined #hpy
<Hodgestar> fangerer: Moving the call to next week sounds like a good idea if both antocuni and ronan can't make it.
<fangerer> Okay, then let's do that. antocuni: ronan: when do you have time?
<mattip> maybe a first proposal would be same time, one week later
mattip has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]
<antocuni> next week works for me
<Hodgestar> Works for me.
<ronan> works for me
<fangerer> then let's settle on July 8th (same time)
mattip has joined #hpy
mattip has quit [Ping timeout: 258 seconds]
mattip_ has joined #hpy
mattip_ is now known as mattip
<ronan> fangerer: OK
mattip has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]
mattip has joined #hpy
<ronan> antocuni: my branch seems ready now. Judging from microbenchmarks, checking the error indicator adds a bit of overhead. OTOH, there is no slowdown if we check only the return value of the C function.
<ronan> It'd be nice to check on more realistic benchmarks, but I don't know what we can use.
<antocuni> have you tested it on ujson and piconumpy?
<ronan> nope, I didn't manage to run piconumpy, and haven't tried ujson yet
jevinskie[m] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
jboi has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
jboi has joined #hpy
jevinskie[m] has joined #hpy