whitequark[cis] changed the topic of #glasgow to: https://glasgow-embedded.org · digital interface explorer · https://www.crowdsupply.com/1bitsquared/glasgow · meetings Saturday 2200 UTC · code https://github.com/GlasgowEmbedded/glasgow · logs https://libera.irclog.whitequark.org/glasgow · matrix #glasgow-interface-explorer:matrix.org · discord https://1bitsquared.com/pages/chat
Emantor has quit [Quit: ZNC - http://znc.in]
Emantor has joined #glasgow
notgull has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
notgull has joined #glasgow
joerg has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]
joerg has joined #glasgow
redstarcomrade has joined #glasgow
redstarcomrade has quit [Changing host]
redstarcomrade has joined #glasgow
_whitenotifier-b has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]
itsmk has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]
ar-jan has joined #glasgow
itsmk has joined #glasgow
redstarcomrade has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
dos has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]
dos has joined #glasgow
redstarcomrade has joined #glasgow
redstarcomrade has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
Wanda[cis] has joined #glasgow
<Wanda[cis]> should I expect the jtag-probe applet and friends to be stable at 10MHz? I'm trying to talk to an XC9500 and failing (the IR data comes in shifted by 1 bit), and I'm not sure if it's because the vendor BSDL file lies about max frequency, or if it's the applet
<whitequark[cis]> nope
<whitequark[cis]> i never got around to refactoring it so that it uses IOB registers
<whitequark[cis]> it just ... well, don't look too closely at what it does
<whitequark[cis]> this should eventually be addressed by improvements at Amaranth level, though, such as streams and new IO
<Wanda[cis]> ok, fair enough
<ali_as> I love those CPLDs, they are only in 3.3v versions now I think.
<whitequark[cis]> atf1502 still comes in 5v
<whitequark[cis]> and luckily i have reverse engineered the entire thing!
<Wanda[cis]> yeah
<Wanda[cis]> I grabbed some actual OG 5V XC9500 off ebay
<Wanda[cis]> unfortunately they seem to be out of spec, and fail to erase with a timeout
<Wanda[cis]> but do seem to erase and program successfully when I manually bump the timeout from 1.3s to 2s
<Wanda[cis]> ... I wonder what kind of violence they were subjected to before they ended up on my desk
nanographs[m] has joined #glasgow
<nanographs[m]> 👋hey everyone
<ali_as> Wow, for the price people seem to want for 9036s on ebay maybe they were recycled from a xilinx reject pile somehere.
<ali_as> 9536s even
<whitequark[cis]> hi nanographs
<nanographs[m]> Is there a meeting today?
<whitequark[cis]> nope, Attie is not doing well
<whitequark[cis]> and neither do I
<nanographs[m]> Aw very sorry to hear that
_whitelogger has joined #glasgow
duskwuff[m] has joined #glasgow
<duskwuff[m]> there's two variants of the XC9500 with different erase sequences. what IDCODE do you get from yours
Lord_Nightmare has quit [Quit: ZNC - http://znc.in]
Lord_Nightmare has joined #glasgow
<Wanda[cis]> what the fuck.
<Wanda[cis]> but, no, I get the normal IDCODE
<Wanda[cis]> I: g.applet.interface.jtag_probe: TAP #0: IR[8] IDCODE=0x29502093