13:12 <d1b2> <josuah> Bouncing back on this here, I can not tell how much time I have ready for this, but Glasgow + ScopeHAL is what I hoped to come-up with.

13:16 <whitequark> oh interesting!

13:20 <josuah> that would become quite the toolchain with custom FPGA RTL and GPU signal processing on a computer ^_^

13:21 <whitequark> Glasgow currently doesn't have a very good story for external software that integrates with it, e.g. there's no Pulseview story

13:31 <josuah> related: https://github.com/GlasgowEmbedded/glasgow/issues/65

13:32 <whitequark> yeah

13:35 <josuah> this also mean we could aim for implicit support by using an existing supported oscilloscope interface

13:35 <whitequark> this is possible

13:35 <whitequark> at some point we'll have Glasgow meetings, I think, and then we can sketch out a path towards that

13:35 <whitequark> (at the time I'm busy with Amaranth and work)

13:36 <josuah> still good to merely keep that on a corner of the head... :)

13:36 <whitequark> yeah

19:26 <d1b2> <TomKeddie> I've been trying to interface another device to libsigrok using an existing protocol, as far as I can tell the protocols are all pretty terrible. SUMP seems awful, no acks for anything and lots of assumptions.

21:12 <cr1901> SUMP is in sigrok finally?

21:29 <josuah> cr1901: looks like so? https://www.sigrok.org/wiki/SUMP_compatibles