12:25 <sochotnicky> I wonder why I keep seeing render: failed to load xcursor pointer 'text' error every time I switch into foot windows - I don't particularly care about cursors, the error is a bit annoying though :-)

12:26 <dnkl> sochotnicky: foot is trying to set the xcursor pointer, but your cursor theme lack a pointer named 'text'

12:26 <dnkl> In the master branch, we've added a fallback to 'xterm', which should fix this

12:27 <dnkl> https://codeberg.org/dnkl/foot/pulls/929

12:28 <sochotnicky> dnkl: I am actually not quite clear - sway's "seat xcursor_theme ..." is presumably only for XWayland? Or does that get used by foot too?

12:31 <dnkl> That command also sets the XCURSOR_THEME variable, which foot does look at (since there's no Wayland generic way to communicate which xcursor theme to use)

12:32 <sochotnicky> ah, right - OK, I guess that will be "it" then...

12:33 <dnkl> Apparently, there's quite a few cursor themes missing 'text'. But they do have 'xterm'... Go figure...

12:37 <sochotnicky> yeah, ty that seems to have worked (and my theme has text so not a big deal)

14:42 <caveman> foot made it into gentoo's portage recently. nice.

14:43 <sochotnicky> yeah, I assume that's why the folks also finally merged my fix for portage to update terminal title when running in foot :-)

14:44 <caveman> there was a fix for portage?

14:44 <sochotnicky> caveman: https://github.com/gentoo/portage/pull/753

14:45 <caveman> oh, gentoo bug.

14:46 <sochotnicky> yeah, nothing too crazy - just a minor annoyance/quality of life thing

14:46 <caveman> i guess that was in part to do with sway adopting foot as default terminal.

14:46 <caveman> swaywm was already in portage. they got checkmated.

14:46 <sochotnicky> hah, possibly. Then again - they could have also just changed the default config

14:47 <sochotnicky> but it's not like foot is crazy hard to package up or has 10 level deep new dependency tree

14:47 <caveman> true, but not worth the extra effort. adding food is easier imo.

14:47 <caveman> foot*

14:47 <sochotnicky> yup

14:48 <caveman> plus, imagine the sorrow that dev must have every time he deleted 'foot' to write 'alacritty'? it's spritual torture.

16:47 <Lord> hey dnkl i just discovered you also coded fnott

16:53 <dnkl> Lord: yup :D

22:56 <Nuc1eoN> dnkl, hey I had recently asked if a scrollbar is on the roadmap for foot, and I had received the answer that it isn't. May I ask for the reasoning, if there is any? It is not that I arbitrarily wish to have a scroll bar, but it genuinely helps when scrolling a lot of output, e.g. when compiling a lot of programs in you terminal with lots of output.

22:56 <Nuc1eoN> I find it not feasible to press Shift+PgUp and wait until it scrolls to the point. Am I missing something?

22:58 <Nuc1eoN> After a few weeks of usage that seems to be the only gripe and pain point with foot for me, so I am interested if there is a background to this.