07:59 <jbtrystram[m]> good morning !... (full message at <https://libera.ems.host/_matrix/media/v3/download/libera.chat/e0afd8491551128232a1d3546f8be4b4e9aad823>)

08:00 <jbtrystram[m]> * good morning !... (full message at <https://libera.ems.host/_matrix/media/v3/download/libera.chat/6a10ee39c0a5f7b11ca6445bdbaf56860d29ef12>)

08:03 <jbtrystram[m]> taking a closer look at the documentation I see that all the example commands are expected to run with root. If you guys confirm i'll submit an update to the tutorial to reflect that : https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora-coreos/tutorial-updates/#_startup_and_initial_update

08:45 <travier[m]> I recommend setting up your libvirt system daemon to accept connections from you unprivileged user: https://fedoramagazine.org/full-virtualization-system-on-fedora-workstation-30/

08:45 <travier[m]> Steps 2 to 4

08:46 <travier[m]> You'll need to overlay the packages on Sericea. I don't think you can run system libvirt in a (root) toolbox

08:48 <travier[m]> You'll also likely need https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora-silverblue/troubleshooting/#_unable_to_add_user_to_group

19:17 <marmijo[m]> Hello everyone. Is it possible to use variable substitution in a butane config? I'm trying to start a container at boot and I'd like to set a dynamic hostname but I dont want to hardcode the hostname since the config will be used for multiple machines.

19:30 <dustymabe> marmijo[m]: you could use something like envsubst

19:30 <dustymabe> but I think generally this feature is tracked in https://github.com/coreos/butane/issues/111

19:30 <marmijo[m]> 👍️ thanks!

19:31 <dustymabe> marmijo[m]: are you just trying to set a hostname inside the container (i.e. like usuing podman run --hostname?)

19:32 <marmijo[m]> Yeah, that's exactly what I'm trying to do. Without setting the hostname, the container picks up the hostname of the 'host', but I'm trying to set it to something different.

19:33 <marmijo[m]> dustymabe: ...but I'm trying to dynamically set it based on the host's IP address

19:34 <dustymabe> maybe we should just set the host's host name to the right value

19:34 <dustymabe> or leave it unset in which case it could get it from DHCP or reverse DNS

19:37 <marmijo[m]> dustymabe: That would be fine too. I'm not sure what the s390x server would do in that case though since there technically isnt a DNS name for it. It might just remain what it currently is set to