Turnikov has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
gursewak has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]
gursewak has joined #fedora-coreos
gursewak has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
gursewak has joined #fedora-coreos
gursewak has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
gursewak has joined #fedora-coreos
gursewak has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
bgilbert has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
gursewak has joined #fedora-coreos
gursewak has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
ravanelli has joined #fedora-coreos
jpn has joined #fedora-coreos
ravanelli has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]
jpn has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]
Betal has quit [Quit: WeeChat 3.8]
jpn has joined #fedora-coreos
b100s has joined #fedora-coreos
<b100s>
hi2all! I'm trying to run cpupower on old cores os (not fcos yet) with 4.19.56 kernel. Did try to use ubuntu container with --privileged=true --net=host. But seems it requires linux-tools-4.19.56-coreos-r1 package. Tried to use toolbox, also old one. The `dnf install kernel-tools` said: "Curl error (6): Couldn't resolve host name for https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org .. getaddrinfo() thread failed to start". Do you have quick way to run cpupower on a
<b100s>
such old node? : )
bgilbert has joined #fedora-coreos
jcajka has joined #fedora-coreos
daMaestro has quit [Quit: Leaving]
jpn has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]
jpn has joined #fedora-coreos
jpn has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]
Turnikov has joined #fedora-coreos
jpn has joined #fedora-coreos
ravanelli has joined #fedora-coreos
saschagrunert has joined #fedora-coreos
ravanelli has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
<guesswhat[m]>
@b100s seems that your dns is not working
vgoyal has joined #fedora-coreos
ravanelli has joined #fedora-coreos
michele9 has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
plarsen has joined #fedora-coreos
mheon has joined #fedora-coreos
jlebon has joined #fedora-coreos
saschagrunert has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
nalind has joined #fedora-coreos
ravanelli has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
jpn has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]
gursewak has joined #fedora-coreos
ravanelli has joined #fedora-coreos
jpn has joined #fedora-coreos
jpn has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
jpn has joined #fedora-coreos
jpn has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
jpn has joined #fedora-coreos
jpn has quit [Ping timeout: 268 seconds]
jpn has joined #fedora-coreos
ravanelli has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
ravanelli has joined #fedora-coreos
jpn has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds]
jpn has joined #fedora-coreos
strnull[m] has quit [Quit: You have been kicked for being idle]
<dustymabe>
cc ravanelli (since I need two reviews)
<bgilbert>
dustymabe: is it correct to blank the notes rather than removing the release?
<dustymabe>
not really sure. we've never had this happen. I kind of like it for the history
<dustymabe>
and it might be less confusing
<bgilbert>
or maybe more confusing, not sure
<bgilbert>
for most folks, it'll never have existed in the timeline
<dustymabe>
yeah.. if I'm a user and i'm on XYZ and my node isn't updating and I go to the release-notes page and don't see the entry - i'd be confused
<dustymabe>
I might be able to be convinced otherwise... :)
<dustymabe>
also wondering on your thoughts about the use of the term `revoked` versus `withdrawn`
<dustymabe>
switched it to withdrawn
* dustymabe
goes for lunch
<bgilbert>
withdrawn feels a bit better to me, yeah
<bgilbert>
"revoked" has a bit of "retroactively invalid" connotation, "withdrawn" is just "removed from use"
<bgilbert>
fair point about the missing notes. stamped