dustymabe changed the topic of #fedora-coreos to: Fedora CoreOS :: Find out more at https://getfedora.org/coreos/ :: Logs at https://libera.irclog.whitequark.org/fedora-coreos
ravanelli has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
Turnikov has joined #fedora-coreos
daMaestro has joined #fedora-coreos
Turnikov has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
Turnikov has joined #fedora-coreos
Turnikov has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
gursewak has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]
gursewak has joined #fedora-coreos
gursewak has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
gursewak has joined #fedora-coreos
gursewak has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
gursewak has joined #fedora-coreos
gursewak has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
bgilbert has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
gursewak has joined #fedora-coreos
gursewak has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
ravanelli has joined #fedora-coreos
jpn has joined #fedora-coreos
ravanelli has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]
jpn has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]
Betal has quit [Quit: WeeChat 3.8]
jpn has joined #fedora-coreos
b100s has joined #fedora-coreos
<b100s> hi2all! I'm trying to run cpupower on old cores os (not fcos yet) with 4.19.56 kernel. Did try to use ubuntu container with --privileged=true --net=host. But seems it requires linux-tools-4.19.56-coreos-r1 package. Tried to use toolbox, also old one. The `dnf install kernel-tools` said: "Curl error (6): Couldn't resolve host name for https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org .. getaddrinfo() thread failed to start". Do you have quick way to run cpupower on a
<b100s> such old node? : )
bgilbert has joined #fedora-coreos
jcajka has joined #fedora-coreos
daMaestro has quit [Quit: Leaving]
jpn has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]
jpn has joined #fedora-coreos
jpn has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]
Turnikov has joined #fedora-coreos
jpn has joined #fedora-coreos
ravanelli has joined #fedora-coreos
saschagrunert has joined #fedora-coreos
ravanelli has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
<guesswhat[m]> @b100s seems that your dns is not working
vgoyal has joined #fedora-coreos
ravanelli has joined #fedora-coreos
michele9 has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
plarsen has joined #fedora-coreos
mheon has joined #fedora-coreos
jlebon has joined #fedora-coreos
saschagrunert has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
nalind has joined #fedora-coreos
ravanelli has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
jpn has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]
gursewak has joined #fedora-coreos
ravanelli has joined #fedora-coreos
jpn has joined #fedora-coreos
jpn has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
jpn has joined #fedora-coreos
jpn has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
jpn has joined #fedora-coreos
jpn has quit [Ping timeout: 268 seconds]
jpn has joined #fedora-coreos
ravanelli has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
ravanelli has joined #fedora-coreos
jpn has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds]
jpn has joined #fedora-coreos
strnull[m] has quit [Quit: You have been kicked for being idle]
<jlebon> ravanelli: we'll be doing an ad-hoc release of `next` early next week for https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-tracker/issues/1441 and it seems you're next in the list. :) will you be able to run that release?
jlebon has quit [Quit: leaving]
Betal has joined #fedora-coreos
jcajka has quit [Quit: Leaving]
gursewak has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
gursewak has joined #fedora-coreos
<dustymabe> bgilbert: release notes update: https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-streams/pull/668
<dustymabe> cc ravanelli (since I need two reviews)
<bgilbert> dustymabe: is it correct to blank the notes rather than removing the release?
<dustymabe> not really sure. we've never had this happen. I kind of like it for the history
<dustymabe> and it might be less confusing
<bgilbert> or maybe more confusing, not sure
<bgilbert> for most folks, it'll never have existed in the timeline
<dustymabe> yeah.. if I'm a user and i'm on XYZ and my node isn't updating and I go to the release-notes page and don't see the entry - i'd be confused
<dustymabe> I might be able to be convinced otherwise... :)
<dustymabe> also wondering on your thoughts about the use of the term `revoked` versus `withdrawn`
<dustymabe> switched it to withdrawn
* dustymabe goes for lunch
<bgilbert> withdrawn feels a bit better to me, yeah
<bgilbert> "revoked" has a bit of "retroactively invalid" connotation, "withdrawn" is just "removed from use"
<bgilbert> fair point about the missing notes. stamped
<dustymabe> TY
Turnikov has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
bgilbert has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]
bgilbert has joined #fedora-coreos
bgilbert has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
<dustymabe> aaradhak[m]: gursewak: marmijo[m]: need one more review on https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-streams/pull/668
jpn has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]
jpn has joined #fedora-coreos
gursewak has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
jpn has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
jpn has joined #fedora-coreos
jpn has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]
jpn has joined #fedora-coreos
gursewak has joined #fedora-coreos
jpn has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]
nalind has quit [Quit: bye for now]
gursewak has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]
gursewak has joined #fedora-coreos
jpn has joined #fedora-coreos
gursewak has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
jpn has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]
plarsen has quit [Quit: NullPointerException!]
mnguyen has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]
mheon has quit [Ping timeout: 268 seconds]
jpn has joined #fedora-coreos
jpn has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]
vgoyal has quit [Quit: Leaving]