00:07 <dustymabe> aaradhak[m]: awesome - you can add a review to the PR if you like :)

10:15 <guesswhat[m]> Ola, is possible to test podman 4.4.0-rc3 ? Should I pick "specific" package versions from podman-next ?

16:19 <dustymabe> jlebon: let's see what happens after https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-releng-automation/pull/168

16:23 <jlebon> dustymabe: stamped!

16:25 <dustymabe> ravanelli: do my comments in https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-config/pull/2206#pullrequestreview-1277409664 help?

16:28 <ravanelli> dustymabe: Yeah. I wasn't sure if it had landed in all streams. Great!

16:28 <dustymabe> maybe add a comment over there letting her know she doesn't need to make any changes

16:29 <dustymabe> ravanelli: the new kernel maybe hasn't landed in `stable` yet, but that's OK. The way we "promote" our lockfiles to testing and then stable means that it doesn't matter. we'll promote the denylist update at the same time we promote the new kernel to those streams

16:30 <ravanelli> dustymabe: 👍 thanks for the explanation

16:30 <dustymabe> ravanelli: np - it might be a little confusing, but it's so powerful once you realize that as long as it passes in `testing-devel` you don't have to worry about it

16:36 <ravanelli> dustymabe: good to know it too.

17:34 <jaimelm_> dustymabe, travier[m] Anything for the OKD meeting (in progress)?

17:36 <dustymabe> nothing from my end - i think travier[m] is AFK for parts of this week

17:38 <jaimelm_> OK, thanks

19:26 <dustymabe> jlebon: should I proceed with putting the pruner to sleep for the next week at least?

19:33 <MTRNord[m]> Hi :)... (full message at <https://libera.ems.host/_matrix/media/v3/download/libera.chat/486719fac2e5508cd08a4c3777b61731e7bca794>)

19:34 <MTRNord[m]> Or do I just use the label?

19:36 <MTRNord[m]> As in am I correctly assuming that this would work?... (full message at <https://libera.ems.host/_matrix/media/v3/download/libera.chat/dad7b559ce8ea7c3babde2f07bb0637ad844cabf>)

19:56 <jlebon> dustymabe: if you mean sleep but running then SGTM. having access to the pod is useful for debugging and testing stuff

20:02 <dustymabe> jlebon: correct

20:02 <dustymabe> https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/pull-request/1304

21:23 <bgilbert> dustymabe: are the NTP dhcp-propagation tests known failing?

21:24 <dustymabe> bgilbert: i noticed it earlier and asked over in #fedora-releng about a potential root cause

21:25 <dustymabe> time-c-g.nist.gov doesn't resolve

21:25 <dustymabe> which breaks the test

21:26 <dustymabe> nirik said it was broken dnssec

21:26 <dustymabe> https://dnsviz.net/d/time-c-g.nist.gov/dnssec/

21:27 <dustymabe> we can denylist the test for a few days - or change the test to somehow not rely on dns

21:40 <bgilbert> wheee

21:40 <bgilbert> thanks

21:41 <dustymabe> bgilbert: do you want to add that to your PR or do you want me to open a separate PR?

21:41 <dustymabe> I guess we need a tracker issue for this too

21:42 <dustymabe> oh interesting

21:42 <dustymabe> https://tf.nist.gov/tf-cgi/servers.cgi

21:43 <dustymabe> time-c-g.nist.gov has no status

21:43 <dustymabe> let's just switch to a different one

21:48 <dustymabe> opening a PR

22:32 <dustymabe> bgilbert: https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-config/pull/2207