07:24 <dwarfkinghreidma> Hi there! I noticed that starting today cincinnati at updates.coreos.fedoraproject.org is throughing 502 errors whenever zincati checks for updates. I'm still pretty new to zincati so I don't know how often that type of thing happens to the update server. I went digging around on github and funny enough certs expired on updates.c.f.o but I think thats probably unrelated since you use lets encrypt and presumably I would be

07:24 <dwarfkinghreidma> getting cert errors. Is this a good place to talk about this issue?

07:25 <dwarfkinghreidma> * Hi there! I noticed that starting today cincinnati at updates.coreos.fedoraproject.org is throughing 502 errors whenever zincati checks for updates. I'm still pretty new to zincati so I don't know how often that type of thing happens to the update server. I went digging around on github and funny enough certs expired on updates.c.f.o a year ago to the day. I think thats probably unrelated since you use lets encrypt and

07:25 <dwarfkinghreidma> presumably I would be getting cert errors. Is this a good place to talk about this issue?

07:25 <dwarfkinghreidma> * Hi there! I noticed that starting today cincinnati at updates.coreos.fedoraproject.org is throwing 502 errors whenever zincati checks for updates. I'm still pretty new to zincati so I don't know how often that type of thing happens to the update server. I went digging around on github and funny enough certs expired on updates.c.f.o a year ago to the day. I think thats probably unrelated since you use lets encrypt and

07:25 <dwarfkinghreidma> presumably I would be getting cert errors. Is this a good place to talk about this issue?

09:16 <travier[m]> dwarf king hreidmar: That's the right place. Can you file an issue in the Fedora CoreOS tracker on GitHub? Thanks!

09:17 <travier[m]> https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-tracker/issues

15:21 <dustymabe> jlebon: bgilbert: any action we should take in regards to https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-tracker/issues/1381 for the upcoming set of releases?

15:26 <jlebon> it seems like to hit this, you need to have CIFS mounts using kerb auth and not renewing the kerb ticket. IMO it's specific enough that it shouldn't block stable, and it's not worth any communications either.

15:27 <jlebon> but interested in bgilbert's thoughts

15:29 <dustymabe> +1

15:29 <dustymabe> This is something where if we had more flexibility in our release notes we could include some communication about it

15:33 <darknao> hi team, just to let you know that your download page on getfedora is being reworked. The new one is available here: https://stg.fedoraproject.org/coreos/download/

15:34 <darknao> please let me know, or the websites team, if you have any feedback about it

15:35 <darknao> we are also planning to add a release notes section to this page at some point

15:36 <dustymabe> darknao: where do we submit feedback on this proposal?

15:36 <darknao> https://gitlab.com/fedora/websites-apps/fedora-websites/fedora-websites-3.0/-/issues can be the right place for that

15:40 <dustymabe> darknao: we'll probably discuss it with the team

15:41 <dustymabe> walters: re: https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-config/pull/2188 where you talk about use cases for the Live ISO - that includes all installs right? so even someone trying to install FCOS on a 2GiB device

20:15 <dustymabe> anyone mind a stamp on https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-config/pull/2189 ?

20:17 <walters> dustymabe: yes

20:29 <dustymabe> walters: thanks! Now, no good deed goes unpunished :)

20:29 <dustymabe> https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-config/pull/2190

20:29 <dustymabe> https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-config/pull/2191

23:25 <bgilbert> dustymabe: I agree with jlebon

23:47 <bgilbert> darknao: the changes look really good; thanks for doing that! I've posted some feedback here: https://gitlab.com/fedora/websites-apps/fedora-websites/fedora-websites-3.0/-/issues/89#note_1248104029