09:30 <travier[m]> decfi: Why are you expecting coreos-installer to mount a LUKS encrypted partition? What's you use case?

13:32 <dustymabe> \o

13:32 <dustymabe> needs review: https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-config/pull/2007

13:57 <lucab> dustymabe: I was unsure about that PR because I saw your other comment at https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-tracker/issues/1313#issuecomment-1272642165. Do you want the pin in anyway?

13:59 <dustymabe> lucab: yes :) - the secondary failure appears to only affect rawhide

13:59 <dustymabe> (i ran a local test)

14:05 <lucab> dustymabe: ack, stamped

14:11 <dustymabe> lucab: thanks!

14:22 <dustymabe> lucab: one more review if you don't mind: https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-config/pull/2008

15:30 <dustymabe> ravanelli: let's disable the branched stream for now: https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-pipeline/pull/686

15:39 <ravanelli> dustymabe: done

16:26 <dustymabe> marmijo: there is a bump-lockfile job running for `next-devel` once that finishes we can run the promotion

16:26 <dustymabe> oh I see you already did

16:26 <dustymabe> that's fine - the only thing that changed was the kernel update

16:26 <marmijo> dustymabe: Yes, I already ran it

16:26 <dustymabe> let me review what you got

16:27 <marmijo> Thanks! Let me know if I need to re-run anything

17:34 <marmijo> dustymabe: the fedora coreos build pipeline is currently "disabled". Is this expected? Is it safe to enable it?

17:42 <dustymabe> marmijo: yeah go ahead and enable it!

17:42 <marmijo> Will do!

18:35 <dustymabe> interesting web interface for Ignition: https://twitter.com/openSUSE/status/1579433220432875520?s=20&t=8Ho2XILee3AFo3V9amcIxQ

18:41 <bgilbert> ^ "No more fiddling around with JSON or Butane."

18:42 <bgilbert> the tool itself is here: https://opensuse.github.io/fuel-ignition/edit

18:54 <dustymabe> bgilbert: i wonder if this is something we should collaborate with them on and utilize as a tool for our community too

19:17 <decfi[m]> <travier[m]> "decfi: Why are you expecting..." <- My use case is pretty simple. On a bare metal server I'd like to provision Fedora CoreOS with two encrypted volumes, root and data. I expect coreos-installer to mount the LUKS encrypted partition with the help of the configured tang server (tang works fine... (full message at <https://libera.ems.host/_matrix/media/r0/download/libera.chat/e215668ce1ac9de95c55f0030896991120a25f55>)

19:19 <dustymabe> ravanelli: do you want to review https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-pipeline/pull/682 ? if the suggested changes are small I'll push a fixup and merge it

19:32 <dustymabe> ravanelli: marmijo: for review as well: https://github.com/coreos/coreos-ci-lib/pull/116

19:39 <travier[m]> decfi: If I understand you setup correctly, you're trying to setup LUKS and then use coreos-installer. It's not how things work on Fedora CoreOS. You install directly with no previous setup with coreos-installer passing the ignition config and then LUKS gets set up by ignition on first boot

19:40 <travier[m]> s/you/your/

19:45 <decfi[m]> <travier[m]> "decfi: If I understand you setup..." <- Sorry, I wasn't clear enough. I don't setup LUKS before, I wipe the disks in the ignition config. My data volume `/dev/sdb` is on a usb drive and the mount path is `/var`. For testing I setup the root volume without LUKS

19:46 <travier[m]> decfi: Then I don't understand your setup. Can you post a detailed description in the discussion forum? https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/tag/coreos

19:46 <travier[m]> It's easier to share config snippets, etc.

19:47 <travier[m]> You can link it here after

19:53 <decfi[m]> https://paste.centos.org/view/89eddea9

19:54 <decfi[m]> error is

19:54 <decfi[m]> * https://paste.centos.org/view/89eddea9

19:56 <decfi[m]> sorry wrong config

19:58 <decfi[m]> https://paste.centos.org/view/e4d90c29

19:59 <decfi[m]> `ignition-disks.service` fails on `var.mount`

20:01 <travier[m]> This is only part of the picture. It does not tell us how you do the installation, etc. Again, I recommend that you post something detailed on the forum

20:02 <decfi[m]> ok thank you

20:33 <dustymabe> jmarrero: reviewed https://github.com/coreos/coreos-assembler/pull/3111

20:38 <dustymabe> marmijo: the azure run failed - looks like an infrastructure flake - we can accept these results as good since the failed test passed in a re-run.

20:39 <dustymabe> marmijo: can you review https://github.com/coreos/coreos-ci-lib/pull/116 ?

20:52 <marmijo> dustymabe: Thanks, I updated the issue with that info.

20:53 <marmijo> pull 116 LGTM!

20:54 <marmijo> I'll wait until tomorrow morning to run the release job

20:54 <dustymabe> marmijo: I need to run but I can review the rollout PR in the morning (you can also finish up any further release steps in the morning) - we're ahead of the ball this week so we don't have to rush

20:55 <marmijo> dustymabe: sounds good!

21:13 <jmarrero> @dustymabe: thanks, on it.