14:11 <beerman> farkuhar: would you kindly _not_ touch my ports without asking?

14:14 <beerman> also not a fan of updating to a libmpcdec checkout and version it yourself

14:14 <beerman> its not a tag

14:14 <beerman> is it?

14:20 <beerman> http://svn.musepack.net/libmpcdec/tags/ <- hint: its not

14:36 <beerman> looking further, it seems like you could have just dropped the old port and created your new port, there is no need to keep the name since you build a whole other package there

14:36 <beerman> sorry, but what is that? 😄

15:17 <farkuhar> beerman, sorry for not asking before editing the greetd README. Let me ask now: since jaeger was recently asking about w/who not showing the expected results, would it make sense to put a line in the README (rather than in the IRC chat where it won't be found as easily)?

15:24 <beerman> Many things would make sense but polluting the fairly easy README surely isn't my preferred way so no, to me it makes no sense, same as the change in libmpcdec.

15:32 <farkuhar> I mentioned in #crux that libmpcdec is basically abandonware. Even so, the upstream project *does* say that libmpcdec 1.2.6 is outdated, and recommends the SV8 tarball instead. Your suggestion to rename the port is a good one, especially since no other port currently depends on it.

16:14 <farkuhar> jaeger, if you're curious: https://todo.sr.ht/~kennylevinsen/greetd/11 might need some upvotes in order to fix the odd behaviour you've noticed in w/who. If a two-year-old ticket starts generating more discussion, then the bug might be assigned higher priority.

17:52 <jaeger> Noted... I've stopped messing with greetd but I'll keep an eye on it