12:21 <beerman> jue: while updating libsdl2, any chance you would've considered adding that one line fix for distcc+ccache use cases?

14:08 <jue> beerman: sure, what fix?

14:09 <beerman> jue: https://libera.irclog.whitequark.org/crux-devel/2022-11-26#33410245;

14:09 <beerman> ccache will get called recursively if you use it with export CCACHE_PREFIX='distcc'

14:13 <jue> hmm, looks not right for me, because it removes /usr/lib/ccache from $PATH

14:15 <jue> that's what I use

14:16 <beerman> thanks for sharing your concern 😉

14:18 <jue> maybe you should test for distcc?

14:19 <beerman> i am already looking into another solution

14:19 <beerman> i never cared if ccache wasn't used for that one project, in that case

14:21 <beerman> [[ -z $CCACHE_PREFIX ]] || unset CCACHE_PREFIX

14:21 <beerman> that should already do the job

14:22 <beerman> or do you use CCACHE_PREFIX for something else?

14:22 <jue> no

14:22 <beerman> i don't really see a use case at first glance

14:22 <beerman> but this makes it not use distcc for that build, which is fine

14:26 <jue> ok, will add that

14:26 <beerman> cool

19:21 <ivandi> beerman: ladspa: Signature mismatch found

19:54 <farkuhar> ivandi: the ladspa tarball must have changed upstream. I don't get a signature mismatch for the tarball downloaded back in September. Downloading a fresh copy gets me a tarball only one byte larger, and recursive diff on the unpacked directories returns nothing.

20:38 <beerman> fix already commited, thanks. no idea what happend but yeah..

20:58 <jaeger> "byte added to annoy packagers"

21:09 <beerman> pretty much, heh