00:02 <benpicco> Hi, what does Armbian use to configure networking these days? I'm trying to disable privacy extensions because I want to run the machine as a server, but to no avail. I've tried net.ipv6.conf.all.use_tempaddr=0 in /etc/sysctl and IPv6PrivacyExtensions=false in /etc/systemd/networkd.conf but to no avail.

00:06 <Dagger> I would actually kind of argue that privacy extensions are fine on servers, or a good idea even

00:07 <Dagger> although they're a bit of a pain if you're trying to do IP-based authentication on connections out from the server, of course

00:22 <DC-IRC> [Discord] <menu> benpicco: NetworkManager or systemd-networkd, configured through netplan, i've not actually run into the privacyextensions though because i use static IPs

00:26 <benpicco> DC-IRC: is there a way to disable NetPlan? Or will it only run when I instruct it to anyway to generate the networkd config?

00:29 <benpicco> ah changing the config in /etc/netplan/10-dhcp-all-interfaces.yaml worked

00:29 <DC-IRC> [Discord] <menu> benpicco: you can configure the networking without it - networkd is only used on minimal images from memory, but it's worth checking, things do change faster than i can update docs

00:30 <DC-IRC> [Discord] <menu> i don't believe privacy extensions are on by default though, they don't appear to be on my LAN, everything gets a predictable hardware ID based address

00:32 <benpicco> DC-IRC: the value in 10-dhcp-all-interfaces.yaml was ipv6-privacy: yes

00:34 <DC-IRC> [Discord] <menu> benpicco: well bugger me :') i don't use DHCP that'll be why

00:40 <Dagger> privacy addresses are generally a SLAAC thing. DHCPv6 does support them but nobody seems to have implemented said support

00:40 <Dagger> and you'll get the predictable MAC-based address whether privacy extensions are on or not. the temporary addresses are extra addresses on top of that

00:43 <DC-IRC> [Discord] <menu> no SLAAC either, i barely support IPv6 at all locally

00:47 <Dagger> well, get that fixed first ...:p

01:52 <DC-IRC> [Discord] <menu> it's not broken :P

03:06 <Dagger> barely supporting v6 sure sounds broken though? :p

12:00 <DC-IRC> [Discord] <menu> Dagger: it is intentional minimal support, unfortunately there's a lot of consumer garbage in my network

21:18 <DC-IRC> [Discord] <nursejackass> Is using userpatches in armbian-build to replace a patch, using matching dir structure & filename, working? I have my file in place like this: ```vagrant:~/git/armbian-build$ ls */kernel/archive/sunxi-6.6/patches.armbian/Add-board-BananaPi-BPI-M4-Zero.patch

21:18 <DC-IRC> [Discord] <nursejackass> patch/kernel/archive/sunxi-6.6/patches.armbian/Add-board-BananaPi-BPI-M4-Zero.patch

21:18 <DC-IRC> [Discord] <nursejackass> userpatches/kernel/archive/sunxi-6.6/patches.armbian/Add-board-BananaPi-BPI-M4-Zero.patch``` But the build does not pick up the one from userpatches. If I move the file up one directory (into userpatches/kernel/archive/sunxi-6.6) it gets run in addition to the one in patch/..., causing an error (since it is trying to patch the same stuff, just slightly differently).

21:18 <DC-IRC> [Discord] <nursejackass> So it is finding files in userpatches, but if they match an existing file in patch, it is using the one in patch. What am I doing wrong here?

22:47 <parabyte> i need to do a sanity check i got a android box off facebook and everything fake about it

22:48 <parabyte> the rockchip multitool boots on device and i can install rockchip armbian

22:48 <parabyte> even though the cpu is labeled allwinner h313 !!

22:48 <parabyte> multitool with its specific rockchip stuff would not boot on a allwinner right?