06:54 <DC-IRC> [Discord] <smc4203> couldn't it be replaced with 6.7?

07:46 <DC-IRC> [Discord] <Werner> Comparing vendor bsp android hackjobs with mainline Linux isn't really gonna work...

10:29 <DC-IRC> [Discord] <mecoblock> It’s been on my NanoPi R5S (RK3568 with friendlyelec vendor kernel 5.10) running in Gen 2 x1 (mainline dts is Gen 3)

11:11 <DC-IRC> [Discord] <enok71> Thanks Meco. Interesting. I will buy one and try it out.

11:12 <DC-IRC> [Discord] <mecoblock> There’s also a 6port asmedia one for around the same price.

11:13 <DC-IRC> [Discord] <mecoblock> Based on ASM1166

11:15 <DC-IRC> [Discord] <enok71> I saw it Meco. Perhaps I should buy one of each and compare performance/stability.

11:41 <DC-IRC> [Discord] <igorpec> https://forums.unraid.net/topic/112739-best-6-port-sata-controller-for-unraid/ here you have compare on 1st class hw, here it can only be worse.

13:49 <DC-IRC> [Discord] <lanefu> Yeah I've got an asm1166 and a r5s on the bench waiting for me to do some storage testing with it

13:50 <DC-IRC> [Discord] <lanefu> It's nice that the m.2 slot on r5s in pcie gen3 x1

15:52 <DC-IRC> [Discord] <enok71> I have a question: there are various "compute modules" based on RK3588. E.g. "cool pi cm5" or "Turing RK1". But what is the point with using RK3588 and not RK3588s for such a devices? The only difference between RK3588/RK3588s is connectivity and package size i.e. pcie version and lanes (correct me if I'm wrong). And a compute module doesn't need things like multiple HDMI outputs <clipped message>

15:52 <DC-IRC> [Discord] <enok71> . I'm guessing power consumption is also to the advantage of RK3588s (but I haven't found any source confirming that).

16:36 <DC-IRC> [Discord] <mecoblock> It really is nice, Friendlyelec just missed on it and R6C having it only be one lane when it technically be up to 4. As a 2.5GbE NAS it’s awesome though

16:38 <DC-IRC> [Discord] <mecoblock> I really like their metal cases

16:42 <DC-IRC> [Discord] <mariob> PCIe 3x4 vs 2x1 is huge

17:06 <DC-IRC> [Discord] <lanefu> I dont think rk3588s on r6c has that much available I/O to slice out once USB 3 is used and pcie lanes interfaces for the nics

17:43 <DC-IRC> [Discord] <enok71> Yes but "compute module" is supposed to be less about I/O and more about power-efficient computations?

17:49 <DC-IRC> [Discord] <mariob> Compute module (at least in RPi terms) means more I/O and flexibility

17:50 <DC-IRC> [Discord] <mariob> rk3588 and rk3588s are the same, jsut that 3588s doesn't have quite a bit of the I/O exposed. If you don't use those h/w blocks on the full rk3588, power draw is pretty much the same

17:50 <DC-IRC> [Discord] <mariob> rk3588 and rk3588s are the same, just that 3588s doesn't have quite a bit of the I/O exposed. If you don't use those h/w blocks on the full rk3588, power draw is pretty much the same

17:53 <DC-IRC> [Discord] <enok71> Ah. So the only pro for rk3588s is lower price and smaller footprint?

17:53 <DC-IRC> [Discord] <mariob> Yes

17:53 <DC-IRC> [Discord] <mariob> Radxa's working on a compute module with rk3588s, not sure if that's being sold yet

17:55 <DC-IRC> [Discord] <enok71> Yes. For number-crunching (neural network training perhaps) it should make sense with rk3588s imo.

17:55 <DC-IRC> [Discord] <enok71> Unless the number-crunching is IO-intensive ...

18:57 <DC-IRC> [Discord] <igorpec> we provide support for this CM https://forum.armbian.com/forum/217-banana-pi-cm4-io-m2s/

19:23 <DC-IRC> [Discord] <lanefu> Rk3588s cm4 just don't make much sense to me. Mostly cuz CM4 is soooo lame as far as what IO is broken out.

19:23 <DC-IRC> [Discord] <lanefu> Bpi CM4 at least is kinda right-sized from a SoC perspective

19:31 <DC-IRC> [Discord] <c0rnelius77> Its also compat with the rpi-cm4 baseboards, so if you know what ur doing it can be a drop-in replacement.

19:50 <DC-IRC> [Discord] <enok71> Interesting. And I found the RK3588s variant as Mario mentioned:

19:50 <DC-IRC> [Discord] <enok71> https://radxa.com/products/compute-module/cm5/

19:55 <DC-IRC> [Discord] <monkablyat> The website is definitely made with more love than the in-house radxa software

19:59 <DC-IRC> [Discord] <monkablyat> One wonders whether even a single board of them can be used without third-party software like Armbian, so there is enough time to design a great website

20:59 <DC-IRC> [Discord] <silas6890> Hi I have a more general question. I'm using an orange pi 5 which happens to change it's Mac Address each reboot so I set one in /etc/interfaces. My question is, does Wake-on-lan work with spoofed Mac addresses? For me it didn't.