jaeger changed the topic of #crux-devel to: CRUX (https://crux.nu/) development channel | Logs: https://libera.irclog.whitequark.org/crux-devel/
pitillo has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds]
pitillo has joined #crux-devel
pitillo has quit [Changing host]
pitillo has joined #crux-devel
groovy2shoes has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds]
groovy2shoes has joined #crux-devel
<farkuhar> beerman: libmad now has a signature mismatch. I think you generated the shasums using an older tarball (one that unpacks into $name-$version rather than $name).
<beerman> but how would I have built it that way that i did with using $name-$version? 🤔
<farkuhar> I dunno, maybe the tarball was already present on disk, so you didn't have to fetch from the newer url.
<farkuhar> I think the older tarball was hosted on the non-resolving domain crux.ster.zone, but it's easy to see how you might have already had it saved locally.
<beerman> but it didn't unpack to $name-$version before the change
<farkuhar> actually the old source url failed 404 for a different reason: the project migrated away from github. Anyway, it's all fixed now.
<beerman> ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
<farkuhar> semi-related to moving scummvm from opt to contrib ... we still have librsvg-compat in opt, but it hasn't received any backported bugfixes since 2020. Even with "Unmaintained" appearing prominently in the Pkgfile header, keeping librsvg-compat in opt might give users the impression that it's safe to install.
<beerman> obvious "i would drop it"
<farkuhar> the lack of any librsvg CVE reports since 2019 could be because there really aren't any exploits, or because the pre-rustified code stopped getting tested so extensively. Safer just to drop it, as beerman says.
<farkuhar> or move librsvg-compat (and its dependency libcroco) to contrib, where users have been warned to be extra-suspicious of port quality (considering the garbage that idiots like me have been known to push there)
<beerman> no need talk shit about yourself really