00:57 <_whitenotifier-8> [rfcs] whitequark synchronize pull request #15: Lifting shape-castable objects - https://github.com/amaranth-lang/rfcs/pull/15

00:57 <_whitenotifier-8> [rfcs] whitequark synchronize pull request #15: Lifting shape-castable objects - https://github.com/amaranth-lang/rfcs/pull/15

01:16 <_whitenotifier-8> [amaranth] whitequark opened pull request #780: Implement RFC 15: Lifting shape-castable objects - https://github.com/amaranth-lang/amaranth/pull/780

01:17 <_whitenotifier-8> [rfcs] whitequark commented on pull request #15: Lifting shape-castable objects - https://github.com/amaranth-lang/rfcs/pull/15#issuecomment-1546481339

01:25 <_whitenotifier-8> [amaranth] whitequark synchronize pull request #780: Implement RFC 15: Lifting shape-castable objects - https://github.com/amaranth-lang/amaranth/pull/780

01:26 <_whitenotifier-8> [rfcs] whitequark synchronize pull request #15: Lifting shape-castable objects - https://github.com/amaranth-lang/rfcs/pull/15

01:30 <_whitenotifier-8> [amaranth] codecov[bot] commented on pull request #780: Implement RFC 15: Lifting shape-castable objects - https://github.com/amaranth-lang/amaranth/pull/780#issuecomment-1546484903

03:51 <_whitenotifier-8> [amaranth] whitequark commented on issue #753: ValueCastable and ShapeCastable should override __instancecheck__ - https://github.com/amaranth-lang/amaranth/issues/753#issuecomment-1546516357

03:58 <_whitenotifier-8> [amaranth] whitequark opened issue #781: Hide implementation details of `amaranth.hdl` - https://github.com/amaranth-lang/amaranth/issues/781

03:58 <_whitenotifier-8> [amaranth] whitequark closed issue #771: Implement RFC 9: Constant initialization for shape-castable objects - https://github.com/amaranth-lang/amaranth/issues/771

11:12 <josuah> what a lot of activity here :)

11:13 <josuah> Has anyone done something like @xobs spibone on Amaranth yet?

11:13 <josuah> https://github.com/xobs/spibone

11:13 <whitequark> no

11:13 <whitequark> amaranth-soc isn't quite ready enough

11:14 <josuah> I am half-way (done, debug/validation needed) through the process of writing one very ad-hoc

11:15 <whitequark> we'll have one upstream eventually

11:15 <josuah> maybe the Interface() RFC would need to come in first, and then many actual interfaces can get a refactor and harmonization

11:16 <whitequark> yes

11:16 <josuah> and we have the chance to have amaranth code already written, which helps with seeing what kind of interfaces can be useful

11:16 <josuah> thanks for the outlook!

11:19 <d1b2> <zyp> when you say «something like», do you count bridges using USB instead of SPI? I've written one for LUNA that's compatible with the USB requests ValentyUSB is using

11:38 <d1b2> <josuah_dem> This project I am using is not having USB accessible to the small (iCE40) FPGA, but to an MCU, so I will do a bit of plumbing across wishbone-serial and wishbone-spi (spibone).

11:38 <d1b2> <josuah_dem> Although, this is good to know about it!

11:41 <josuah> How is the funding of Amaranth organized? I mean it as an FAQ-style questions about the Amaranth project itself rather than an overly personnal question about the members.

11:41 <whitequark> at the moment Chipflow has hired two developers (me and JF) to work on Amaranth full time

11:43 <josuah> This is great news!

19:46 <d1b2> <Olivier Galibert> excellent

21:11 <cr1901> Will the Amaranth stream interface include (or all) of the AXI Stream signals?

21:44 <cr1901> include most (or all)*... stuff like TID/TDEST

23:50 <whitequark> no, not stuff like TID/TDEST