13:23 <tankf33der> Hi all

13:24 <tankf33der> regenaxer: do you remember a place where was an example that picolisp is faster C.

13:24 <tankf33der> It was a wiki or something like this.

14:12 <Regenaxer> tankf33der, I do not think that PicoLisp can be faster than C

14:12 <Regenaxer> purely language

14:12 <Regenaxer> Only if different algorithms were used

14:29 <beneroth> tankf33der, maybe this? http://john.freml.in/teepeedee2-vs-picolisp

14:31 <beneroth> but that was comparison to common lisp and not really a good comparison

14:32 <Regenaxer> Ah, right, long time ago. And it is not raw prouessing speed but some Web response

14:33 <beneroth> I believe there are examples where Common Lisp achieves better speeds than C, due to binary representations and algorithms. and sometimes this will apply to PicoLisp to, some things are cheaper in PicoLisps than in other languages - but I'd say PicoLisp is also a bit more limited to the kind of optimizations you can make besides improving your own pil code.

16:02 <tankf33der> https://picolisp.com/wiki/?needforspeed

16:02 <tankf33der> Like this but it was for C.

16:03 <tankf33der> Small example.

16:06 <Regenaxer> I see