<Guest30>
HI there .. I'm new to openocd and would like to know if it is possible to use openocd with a TI mspm0l SoC?
<PaulFertser>
Guest30: hi
<PaulFertser>
Guest30: what CPU core is that?
<Guest30>
PaulFertser: ARM Cortex-M0+
<PaulFertser>
Guest30: then you should be able to talk to this target, yes.
<PaulFertser>
To stop execution, inspect memory, add breakpoints etc.
gamiee has quit [Server closed connection]
gamiee has joined #openocd
zear has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
zear has joined #openocd
matsievskiysv has joined #openocd
matsievskiysv has quit [Client Quit]
<Guest30>
PaulFertser thank you
matsievskiysv has joined #openocd
<Guest30>
I will give it a try
<Guest30>
I have 2 adapters: a st-link v2 and a st-link v3. in the docu I found: "They only work with STMicroelectronics chips" is this correct and it is not expected that these adapters will work with the TI SoC?
<Haohmaru>
stlink v3 won't work
<matsievskiysv>
They only support SWD protocol. Does the SoC support it?
<Haohmaru>
for v2 i've heard that they can often be made to work
<matsievskiysv>
Hello! I've written the nor flash driver (https://review.openocd.org/c/openocd/+/8400), but I'm not very familiar with gerrit workflow. Should I add the reviewer to the PR? Is there like a subsystem maintainer for nor flash?
<Guest30>
matsievskiysv The TI SoC only supports SWD
<Haohmaru>
afaik the stlink2 should be easier to get working with non-ST targets
<PaulFertser>
matsievskiysv: basically, you can complain here or on the mailing list that the patch is not getting review.
<PaulFertser>
matsievskiysv: and btw, thank you for the patch indeed!
<PaulFertser>
Guest30: so just try stlinkv2 with it.
_olerem has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
a3f has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]
shoragan has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]
xphn_ has quit [Server closed connection]
xphn has joined #openocd
a3f has joined #openocd
shoragan has joined #openocd
matsievskiysv has quit [Quit: Quit]
matsievskiysv has joined #openocd
matsievskiysv has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]
Haohmaru has quit [Quit: saionara]
marex has quit [Server closed connection]
marex has joined #openocd
Hawk777 has joined #openocd
Guest30 has quit [Quit: Client closed]
jybz has quit [Server closed connection]
jybz has joined #openocd
nerozero has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds]
cp- has quit [Server closed connection]
cp- has joined #openocd
cambrian_invader has quit [Server closed connection]
cambrian_invader has joined #openocd
sevan has joined #openocd
bacam has quit [Quit: reboot]
bacam has joined #openocd
sevan has quit [Changing host]
sevan has joined #openocd
<karlp>
wrt to things lik #8400, (and others) would it be a viable idea at some point for openocd ro reuse/develop some sort of "common" compiled format, instead of having to recompile things like those helpers all over the place?
<karlp>
I know normally it's a non issue, as the flash loaders are tied pretty 1:1 to the flash target, but... maybe it would open up more of these sorts of peripheral things if iwe didn't have to recompile them all separately?