06:19 <discocaml> <darrenldl> i mean if ecosystem is all you are after, then cant really go wrong with python

09:59 <discocaml> <uncomfyhalomacro> i think OCaml will be my first experience with an ML family of languages. i just joined yesterday

11:00 <darchitect1> hey guys, this is for anyone who uses Eldoc + Emacs for OCaml dev -> do you know how to view the full docstring comment of a signature/value/etc.. in the gutter ? Currently I can only see the usual `a -> b -> c (** some long comment ... *)` with `...` in place of the remainder of the long docstring comment

12:43 <vsiles> is there a way to make dune build only output the path of files with errors, instead of the whole error contents ? I'm trying to find a nice way to collect them and open them in vim, so only the path is relevant

12:43 <vsiles> and I'd like to avoid a custom build script / tons of bash pipes

13:19 <theblatte> vsiles: add "-error-style short" to the ocamlc parameters?

14:19 <darchitect1> why am I constantly being disconnected from the server ?

14:21 <companion_cube> are you turning your computer off or something?

14:22 <vsiles> theblatte: hmmm let's see if I can do that from the command line

14:43 <theblatte> vsiles: doubtful!

14:44 <theblatte> vsiles: oh wait: "The environment variable "OCAML_ERROR_STYLE" is considered if -error-style is not provided. Its values are short/contextual as above."

15:12 <vsiles> Better ! But still not minimal enough, we're getting the message (but no code !)

15:12 <vsiles> Thanks for pointing it out.

15:12 <vsiles> less bloat, it's easier already

15:16 <theblatte> can't vim go to compiler errors that are formatted in this very standard way? ^^

15:27 <vsiles> yes, if you invoke it the right way (using `:make`) but I'm experimenting with `dune build -w` so it's in an emulated terminal

15:27 <vsiles> I'm slowly learning vimscript and fzf to make a fuzzy matcher on that terminal output, now it's more reasonable

16:57 <discocaml> <geoff> Seems like we're missing some of the messages from IRC, unless they were direct messages that were responded to publicly

20:16 <darchitect1> what do you guys think of Haskell, I've just been through Robert Harper's course on Programming Languages and he says Standard ML and OCaml are basically the only two languages that are the "true languages" from a type theoretic point of view and Haskell is more or less badly implemented because you always have `undefined` and you don't have inductive types. You would be foolish to asume I

20:16 <darchitect1> understood more than about 60% of the lectures so I just wanted to see what you guys think about this?