09:17 <kares[m]> headius: hmm not sure but what else would nuke the file, could try taking a look - recall it's been a bit of a hustle to get it working ...

09:18 <kares[m]> will try locally if I see the behavior

09:19 <kares[m]> btw. with core moved (base being the new core) how are you building just the .jar when .java parts change?

16:47 <basshelal[m]> headius: I'm a little annoyed that JNR-FFI doesn't support structs by value, especially as parameters, I discussed this with enebo while you were on vacation.

16:47 <basshelal[m]> How easy do you think it would be to add this at some point, I had a bit of a go myself but started to lose the plot and got busy with other work.

18:08 <edipofederle[m]> Hi Guys, we plan to make some similar improvements (ref: https://github.com/oracle/truffleruby/pull/2259/) on JRuby side ?

21:32 <headius> edipo.federle: it would not be difficult but we have been focusing on getting 9.3 features done

21:33 <edipofederle[m]> I see, I am trying to find something to work next... maybe you have some suggestion?

21:33 <headius> Should be able to optimize class vars as well as TR with a little effort

21:33 <headius> Hmm

21:34 <headius> Maybe have a look at the remaining things targeted at 9.3 and something will look good

21:35 <edipofederle[m]> I will check

21:37 <edipofederle[m]> you mean https://github.com/jruby/jruby/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+instance+methods+milestone%3A%22JRuby+9.3.0.0%22 ?