13:54 <jaeger> I'm going to go ahead and push the libbsd update today to move it to a nonstandard path

13:55 <SiFuh> jaeger: which path did you decide?

13:56 <jaeger> Currently /usr/opt/libbsd, I still prefer to leave /usr/local and /opt out of package management

13:57 <SiFuh> It will do for the time being though.

16:11 <jaeger> hrm... anyone having trouble with dhcpcd 9.4.1 getting a lease successfully?

16:11 <jaeger> I'm getting problems with it on a VM but it's working fine on other hosts... very odd

16:11 <jaeger> downgrading that VM to 9.4.0 works

16:29 <darfo> i'm using qemu 7.1.0 and dhcpcd works but that is with a -net user network not a real one

16:30 <darfo> d'oh. I see that is a fresh install of 3.7 so dhcpcd is version 9.4.0.105

16:33 <jaeger> I've tested this same VM on both a crux libvirt install and ovirt... same result. 9.4.0 works, 9.4.1 doesn't

16:33 <jaeger> both using qemu, though

16:34 <darfo> i upgraded to dhcpcd to 9.4.1 and it is failing for me to now

16:36 <darfo> curious, ps -ef|grep dhcpcd shows way less threads with 9.4.1 than with 9.4.0.105

16:37 <jue> yep, the problem is that we accidently committed an update to 9.4.1, the version from the ISO works with our glibc

16:38 <jaeger> I just tested on a physical machine too, same issue

16:38 <jaeger> ok, so 9.4.1 and glibc have some problem?

16:39 <jue> yes, that's the reason why I've created the 'special' version 9.4.0.105, which includes the fix

16:40 <jue> the version number is a bit odd, it's the 105th commit since 9.4.0, which I've extracted from the REF's

16:41 <jue> I'll revert the last commit

16:42 <jaeger> ok

16:47 <jue> done, should work again ;)

16:47 <jaeger> cool, thanks

16:47 <jaeger> just glad I'm not going crazy :)

18:22 <stenur> i btw got only one mail for four bug reports; maybe someone was currently working on the server, that can well be. just to mention it.

18:43 <jaeger> I only see one attempted mail to you in the mail log for today

18:52 <jaeger> for what that's worth

20:20 <jaeger> I cherry-picked the latest mesa-32 and llvm-32 updates from 3.7 into 3.6, just FYI

20:22 <jaeger> I've still got a 3.6 system with wine-staging on it that I'll be using for a while

23:34 <jaeger> beerman: mind if I update the .signature for libgnome-keyring?

23:38 <farkuhar> earlier today i tried to reproduce the dhcpcd 9.4.1 failure, but still got a lease for my laptop on that network. Now from my desktop, on a different network, upgrading to 9.4.1 leads to breakage. Both connections were wired ethernet. I wonder if the DHCP server on the first network was responding in a way that didn't trigger the 9.4.1 bug.

23:54 <jaeger> Could be, I suppose... what are you using as the servers on those networks?