jaeger changed the topic of #crux-arm to: CRUX-ARM 3.6 Released! - http://crux-arm.nu/Documentation/ReleaseNotes3-6 | Logs: https://libera.irclog.whitequark.org/crux-arm/
<pitiIIo> beerman: I believe it's the way to go if CRUX goes in that way....
<pitiIIo> after all, these are CRUX-ARM's principles
<beerman> pitiIIo: ultimately it should be a lot easier to maintain crux arm that way
<pitiIIo> MISSING -rwxr-xr-x root/root usr/lib/gobject-introspection/giscanner/_giscanner.cpython-39-x86_64-linux-gnu.so
<pitiIIo> NEW -rwxr-xr-x root/root usr/lib/gobject-introspection/giscanner/_giscanner.cpython-39-arm-linux-gnueabihf.so
<pitiIIo> we keep with footprint mistmatches over architectures
<pitiIIo> or we force the footprint mistmatch ignore or we keep overlays to maintain these diferences
<beerman> argh well okay, thats a problem
<beerman> thats something we need to discuss
ardo has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
ardo has joined #crux-arm
ardo has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
ardo has joined #crux-arm