17:07 <isd> fr33domlover: (1) FYI, I pushed a change to haskell-capnp so that it uses regular lists in the high-level serialization, rather than Vectors, which I think is much more ergonomic; if folks want imperative style arrays they can use the low-level API. (2) Could I bother you to provide some feedback both on the ideas I've floated in https://codeberg.org/zenhack/haskell-capnp/issues/89, and also in general what constructs are most painful in

17:07 <isd> haskell-capnp? I have things that bother me, and a general sense of "it's too verbose," but it would be useful to get a user who didn't write it to complain about specific details that I can hopefully make actionable.

17:08 <isd> (I recently started fussing with a project that uses the library, so I am newly motivated to hack on it, even though I'm trying to keep it from stealing too much time from Tempest)