<mmichelson>
(I selected the text but didn't ctrl+c)
<mmichelson>
But anyway, _lore_ is out and can't address review comments. Would it be possible to put the patch in as-is, with the idea that the recommended updates get merged prior to release?
<zhouhan>
I see, the patch is almost there, just a O(n) iteration needs a hash index (or just sset)
<dceara>
The TL/DR is that Martin has a v5 almost ready that would work well enough as an experimental feature. Just that aside from mmichelson's RFC we have no definition of "experimental". :)
<dceara>
Should we merge the RFC too (or a formal version of it) in 24.09?
<mmichelson>
I think we can merge the RFC. I can add a follow-up in the FAQ that addresses your concern dceara
<dceara>
Ack, thanks.
<mmichelson>
The follow-up would be something like "How are features marked experimental?"
<dceara>
Perfect!
<mmichelson>
I don't think the "experimental" documentation change needs to make it in before branching, IMO.
<mmichelson>
So if we can get Martin's patch in, mark it experimental, and then we can get the Documentation change in after.
<dceara>
Oh one more thing, I posted a patch to pin ovn-kube CI to their release branch instead of master.
<dceara>
It's permafailing since last night.
<mmichelson>
oof
<dceara>
Now that's really it, thanks! :)
<mmichelson>
OK thanks dceara
<mmichelson>
Who's next?
<imaximets>
May I?
<mmichelson>
go ahead imaximets
mkalcok has joined #openvswitch
<imaximets>
I don't have much on OVN side. Did some reviews.
<mkalcok>
(soory for joining late, lost track of time)
<imaximets>
That's all, I guess. :) Can't remember much else.
<mmichelson>
Thanks imaximets. Who would like to go next?
<mmichelson>
mkalcok, I do it all the time :)
<zhouhan>
I can go quicklyu
<mmichelson>
zhouhan, go for it
<zhouhan>
I have been reviewing bfd I-P patch and Numan's centrailized routing patch
<zhouhan>
I am waiting for a follow up patch for Numan's patch
<zhouhan>
Also merged my ovn-encap-ip-default patch. Thanks numan for review.
<zhouhan>
I will try to look at more patches today and tomorrow
<zhouhan>
That's it from me
<mmichelson>
Thanks zhouhan
<mmichelson>
who would like to give the next update?
<fnordahl>
I have a quick update: good follow-up discussion with amusil on path forward for BGP work next cycle, and other than that downstream stuff
<fnordahl>
That's it for me
<mmichelson>
Thanks fnordahl.
<mmichelson>
Anyone else?
<mkalcok>
I could do one
<mkalcok>
I've been discussing the BGP/BFD redirecting with dceara and Vladislav. I'm close to posting v5 after updates to docs/tests, that should hopef
<mkalcok>
ully address the issues discovered during the discussion
<mkalcok>
thanks dceara for the patience with the review. I know it's been a long discussion.
<zhouhan>
mmichelson: I just acked for _lore_'s bfd I-P patch. Let me know if you will merge it or you want me to do it.
<mmichelson>
zhouhan, I can do it.
<dceara>
mkalcok, sorry for not reviewing it earlier..
<mmichelson>
mkalcok, we discussed your patch a bit earlier in the meeting before you joined.
<mmichelson>
The idea is that we can merge it as "experimental" and my documentation change about what experimental means can also be merged for 24.09
<mkalcok>
mmichelson, oh, great to hear, I'll try to post the v5 asap :) thanks for the recap
<mmichelson>
mkalcok, great, thanks.
* dceara
disappears early, bye everyone
<mmichelson>
mkalcok, were you done with your update?
roriorden has quit [Quit: Leaving]
<mkalcok>
oh yeah, all from me, sry
<mmichelson>
ok cool
<mmichelson>
anybody else?
<zhouhan>
related to experimental, Numan and I also agreed about marking the centrailized routing experimental and hopefully remove the option completely in the future.
<mmichelson>
OK
<mmichelson>
I guess nobody else wants to give an update. Thanks everyone and have a good day.