NishanthMenon changed the topic of #openocd to: this is the place to discuss all things OpenOCD | Logs: https://libera.irclog.whitequark.org/openocd/
thinkfat has joined #openocd
thinkfat_ has quit [Ping timeout: 268 seconds]
boru` has joined #openocd
boru has quit [Killed (NickServ (GHOST command used by boru`))]
boru` is now known as boru
tsal_ has joined #openocd
tsal has quit [Ping timeout: 258 seconds]
Hawk777 has joined #openocd
<ttmrichter> rapha: Generally with some exceptions there's very little kit made anymore that uses RTS/CTS/DTR/DSR as actual RS-232 signals. Some programmers, though, use those pins as a hack for putting chips into a boot mode.
cmcmanis has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
ildar[m] has joined #openocd
<ildar[m]> greetings!
<ildar[m]> Q: does RTT in openocd support duplex? I can't get data passed to MCU through RTT down channel 😕
sbach has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
sbach has joined #openocd
Hawk777 has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
Haohmaru has joined #openocd
wolfshappen_ has quit [Ping timeout: 258 seconds]
thinkfat has quit [Quit: Konversation terminated!]
diddly has quit [Ping timeout: 258 seconds]
diddly has joined #openocd
diddly has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]
tarekb has joined #openocd
diddly has joined #openocd
nohit has joined #openocd
emeb has joined #openocd
<tarekb> PaulFertser: I'm working on STM32L5/U5 configuration files, and I needed to work with 'flash list' command
zjason has quit [Read error: No route to host]
<tarekb> I was surpised that the command is reporting the driver name and not the flash name
<tarekb> example:
<tarekb> {name stm32l4x base 201326592 size 0 bus_width 0 chip_width 0}
<tarekb> {name stm32l4x base 134217728 size 0 bus_width 0 chip_width 0}
<tarekb> {name stm32l4x base 200933376 size 0 bus_width 0 chip_width 0}
<tarekb> I expected sthg like:
<tarekb> {name stm32l5x.flash_ns driver stm32l4x base 134217728 size 0 bus_width 0 chip_width 0}
<tarekb> {name stm32l5x.flash_alias_s driver stm32l4x base 201326592 size 0 bus_width 0 chip_width 0}
<tarekb> {name stm32l5x.otp driver stm32l4x base 200933376 size 0 bus_width 0 chip_width 0}
<tarekb> IMO this seems to be more correct
<tarekb> do you think this should be fixed, or there is some history behind this ?
tarekb has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
Hawk777 has joined #openocd
Haohmaru has quit []
thinkfat has joined #openocd
emeb has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
urja has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
urja has joined #openocd
thinkfat has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
thinkfat has joined #openocd
Hawk777 has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
Hawk777 has joined #openocd
borneoa_ has quit [Quit: Connection closed for inactivity]