cr1901 has quit [Killed (NickServ (GHOST command used by cr1901_!~cr1901@2601:8d:8600:911:b53b:2da8:6938:93cb))]
cr1901_ is now known as cr1901
cr1901_ has joined #openFPGALoader
cr1901 has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
UweBonnes has joined #openFPGALoader
<UweBonnes>
I have serveral changes at git@github.com:UweBonnes/openFPGALoader. Can you have a look at the changes? Should I do pull requests? One request or several?
<trabucayre>
everything about te board (board, flash and fpga model) may be one PR with multiple commit (one for the fpga, one for the flash and one for the board)
<trabucayre>
doc must be updated too :)
<UweBonnes>
Okay.
<UweBonnes>
Is it good toe have the devices requiring full vivado license in the main makefile?
<trabucayre>
When no choise :-/
<trabucayre>
I prefer when bitstream is build why opensource tools or free version.
<trabucayre>
In fact it's a good question, but since some bitstream was built with full license
<trabucayre>
s/why/with/g
<trabucayre>
for searching bridge into ../spiOverJtag: it's possible to use -B, --bridge to specify explicitly the file
cr1901_ is now known as cr1901
<cr1901>
I don't personally see the problem w/ having paid bitstreams in the repo, as long as it's clear that an end user can't regenerate them w/o a full Vivado license