lanefu changed the topic of #armbian-rockchip to: Armbian - Linux for ARM development boards | Rockchip SoC | www.armbian.com | This channel is relayed to the equivalent Discord channel | this channel is logged
<Armbian-Discord>
<Tenkawa> @lanefu I have a CM4/IO board sitting in a drawer idle right now
<Armbian-Discord>
<lanefu> I believe someone was in here with opi4 lts the other day and only issue was no wifi or Bluetooth
<Armbian-Discord>
<lanefu> Oh Lord that was THE conversation in #armbian-devel I go no further
<Armbian-Discord>
<MicroLinux (Salva)> Yeah, but the 4GB opi4 use rk3399, while the 3gb of ram version use rk3399t
<Armbian-Discord>
<MicroLinux (Salva)> @kprasadvnsi do you know of anyone got the T variant opi4 running on mainline?
<Armbian-Discord>
<MicroLinux (Salva)> The problem is strictly related to the lower quality T variant (RK3399t)
<Armbian-Discord>
<kprasadvnsi> The new OPi 4 LTS has rk3399-t. It can run linux 5.19
<Armbian-Discord>
<Tonymac32> I can't think of a reason the stupid and unnecessary T couldn't run mainline
<Armbian-Discord>
<MicroLinux (Salva)> Me neither.
<Armbian-Discord>
<MicroLinux (Salva)> Much better then
<Armbian-Discord>
<MicroLinux (Salva)> Well, my doubts where strictly related to a uboot problem not being able to boot linux since the ram frequencies in which rk3399 run aren't feasible on rk3399t
<Armbian-Discord>
<Tonymac32> Hmmmmmm that should be super simple to handle, use the slow blob
<Armbian-Discord>
<MicroLinux (Salva)> Maybe, but again, after several months.. I don't think a dtb stopped radxa to provide mainline on its last rk3399.. it's a really bad idea
<Armbian-Discord>
<MicroLinux (Salva)> It's like sinking on a glass of water
<Armbian-Discord>
<MicroLinux (Salva)> Rk linux is the absolute champ on horrible downstream linux
<Armbian-Discord>
<Tonymac32> I think the effort hasn't been taken on by the right people, and Radxa doesn't really care that much.