12:41 <tagr> DavidHeidelberg: not much

12:43 <tagr> it's no longer accurate that the current driver is broken, as far as I know

12:43 <tagr> and kmsro has several drawbacks (or at least had back at the time) that make it less efficient than what we have now

13:19 <DavidHeidelberg> tagr: I meant, tegra support should be kept then?

13:19 <tagr> I don't know what you mean, the above patch doesn't remove Tegra support, it merely uses a different driver

13:19 <tagr> or approach, rather

13:21 <tagr> I guess I'm not sure where you're coming from, is there some particular issue that you're facing? in other words: why do you ask?

13:55 <DavidHeidelberg> tagr: just asking about the relevance of the MR

13:57 <tagr> I see

14:10 <kwizart> I wonder if this MR assumes tk1+ (so using kmsro with nouveau) as for older tegra this is still a regression (despite I'm pretty sure there is not much difference there as native mesa driver isn't reliable)

14:10 <kwizart> it would be fine to share an official statement on this MR rather than the status quo (at it's one pace)

16:46 <tagr> yeah, that MR is for Tegra124 and later only, I don't think there's any support for earlier chips in upstream Mesa at this point

16:46 <tagr> I know that people have been working on it, but not sure if anything was ever merged

18:27 <kwizart> mesa for grate wasn't touched recently, but it still has the initial patch that was merged into mesa for tegra (altough renamed to grate)

18:27 <kwizart> https://github.com/grate-driver/mesa/commits/grate

18:28 <kwizart> but I don't think using grate either sorted been on Tegra124 and later anyway...