NishanthMenon changed the topic of #openocd to: this is the place to discuss all things OpenOCD | Logs: https://libera.irclog.whitequark.org/openocd/
Willy-- has quit [Quit: Konversation terminated!]
tsal_ has joined #openocd
tsal has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]
Hawk777 has joined #openocd
akaWolf has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
Hawk777 has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
Hawk777 has joined #openocd
PlasmaHH has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
PlasmaHH has joined #openocd
agent314 has joined #openocd
agent314 has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
nerozero has joined #openocd
Haohmaru has joined #openocd
Hawk777 has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
en-sc has joined #openocd
<en-sc> Hi everyone! Can somebody here help me with a mailing list issue. I'm subscribed to the openocd-devel list from two emails, and in one of them a patch got quarantined due to a suspicious attachment.
<en-sc> However, the same patch was delivered just fine to another email and the message in question did not contain any attachments
<en-sc> The patch is 3390cb7b19 doc/manual: Fix Tcl spelling
<en-sc> The only difference I see is that when it got blocked, it was sent from openocd-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net
<PaulFertser> en-sc: hey
<PaulFertser> en-sc: well, do you really need to send a patch to the mailing list? It wouldn't be properly reviewed in that case anyway because the patches should be sent to the OpenOCD Gerrit instance.
<PaulFertser> en-sc: do you have any specific issue with Gerrit?
<en-sc> PaulFertser: no, everything is fine. The issue is on my side. This is not my patch, it's zapb's
<en-sc> I've just missed the e-mail notification
<PaulFertser> en-sc: hm, do you want me to check the SMTP daemon logs to see what happened while sending the mail to you?
<PaulFertser> But openocd-devel is sent from the SF.net mailing server, not ours.
<PaulFertser> I can check whatever is sent directly from Gerrit but we're talking about mails the Gerrit sends to the mailing list and then the mailing list distributes the mails.
<PaulFertser> So are you asking about a mail that's properly fully visible in the SF.net mailing list archive interface but not delivered to one of your addresses?
<en-sc> Thanks for the suggestion! I'm really just asking for some advice on what I can do
<PaulFertser> OK, when you say "a patch got quarantined" what system enforced the quarantine?
<Haohmaru> The W.H.O.
<PaulFertser> FWIW, the mail "[PATCH]: 32a609f07e doc/openocd: Fix Tcl spelling" has no attachments, it's all plain text.
<PaulFertser> Message-Id: <20250418072711.972D4E3@openocd.org>
<en-sc> Proxmox Mail Gateway
<PaulFertser> en-sc: who controls that Mail Gateway?
<PaulFertser> Can you show full report from it?
<en-sc> Unfortunately, I can not.
<PaulFertser> en-sc: so basically you're saying that your e-mail provider says it didn't like something about one of the mailing list letters but you can not show what exactly it didn't like and you can not talk to the email provider admin to get more details, is that it?
<Haohmaru> whitespaceoverflow
<en-sc> I'll try asking for more details. I'm not sure I will be able to share them here
<Haohmaru> i'll close my eyes, don't worry ;P~
<en-sc> I'm sorry to bother. I was wondering maybe you have some idea how this could have happen from the top of your head. Please, don't waste too much time on it
<PaulFertser> en-sc: let's put it this way, I'm not aware of any issues with configuration of the mailing list software on SF.net side. However, it looks like "dkim=fail" might be an issue. It used to be proper but now probably SF changed something.
<PaulFertser> If your mail admins tell that DKIM is problematic then I suggest you try opening a ticket with SF.net support providing all the details they might need.
<en-sc> Thanks a lot! This is quite funny how much faster you are then our IT guys)
<PaulFertser> :D
<PaulFertser> When Gerrit sends out messages it doesn't specify any DKIM headers at all.
<en-sc> If somebody wonders -- I was lied to. There was no mysterious attachment.
<en-sc> They gave me logs and the triggered rule was KAM_TK, that seems to be similar to https://github.com/alsyundawy/v3/blob/474b2acb446fbefc1368e0cfea80fad0292a4376/build/EFA/KAM.cf#L2490-L2493
<en-sc> AFAIU, it just searches the body for a link to .tk (and the mail in question did contain a link to https://jim.tcl.tk/)
<en-sc> From wikipedia it seems the rule is outdated: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.tk
<en-sc> Anyway, huge thanks!
en-sc has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
en-sc has joined #openocd
en-sc has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
tlwoerner has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
<PaulFertser> Yeah, "Visit http://jim.tcl.tk/ for more information on Jim." would trigger it
Haohmaru has quit [Quit: saionara]
Guest21 has joined #openocd
Guest21 has left #openocd [#openocd]
<gamiee> karlp : the STM32H5 support is only in ST openocd fork, unfortunately
<gamiee> and indeed it's super strange, other chips, like U5 or other latest chips are upstreamed, but this one is not.
<gamiee> I needed to add SWO support by myself, as the ST fork does not have it for H5.
<gamiee> Additionally, it is also slow, due it uses internal slow clocks, thus slow JTAG speed.
nerozero has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds]
PlasmaHH has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]
PlasmaHH has joined #openocd
shibboleth has joined #openocd
shibboleth has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
PlasmaHH has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds]