krzk changed the topic of #linux-exynos to: Linux Samsung SoC Exynos and Family | https://exynos.wiki.kernel.org | This channel is logged: https://libera.irclog.whitequark.org/linux-exynos
_whitelogger has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
_whitelogger has joined #linux-exynos
viciouss[m] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
tobiasjakobi has joined #linux-exynos
tobiasjakobi has quit [Client Quit]
sauce has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
tobiasjakobi has joined #linux-exynos
tobiasjakobi has quit [Client Quit]
tobiasjakobi has joined #linux-exynos
<Grimler> krzk: I will test on Tuesday (when I have access to HW) if no one beats me to it
<krzk> Grimler: Thanks
<Grimler> krzk: I see you placed the connector node directly under pmic@66. Is this more correct than having it under a max77693-muic subnode (as for example exynos5433-tm2-common does it)?
<Grimler> The max77693-muic bindings do not currently support a connector subnode, so that route would require binding updates in any case
<krzk> Grimler: this make sense, but would require adding muic node to DTS
<krzk> which is not a big deal, thanks
<krzk> although then it cannot be shared with for example charger
tobiasjakobi has quit [Quit: Leaving]
tobiasjakobi has joined #linux-exynos
<Grimler> krzk: yes, maybe there are some downsides, but connector seem to be wired directly to MHL chip and MUIC part of pmic, so seems like placing the connector node under /22
<Grimler> .. under a muic subnode would be mpst accurate
tobiasjakobi has quit [Quit: Leaving]
<krzk> Grimler: I sent v2 of DTS.
<Grimler> krzk: thanks, and thanks for working on this. I'll respond to the thread with test results in a few days
viciouss[m] has joined #linux-exynos
sauce has joined #linux-exynos