11:03 <fangerer> antocuni: Hodgestar: what do you think about https://github.com/hpyproject/hpy/pull/394 ?

13:57 <steve_s> If people have spare cycles, please take a look at the multi-phase module initialization proposal: https://github.com/hpyproject/hpy/pull/393 :-)

15:39 <antocuni> fangerer, steve_s: cool, I'll try to have a loot at both :)

15:39 <antocuni> does anybody know socketify.py? https://github.com/cirospaciari/socketify.py

15:40 <antocuni> they show some benchmarks in which PyPy is super fast and the README mentions HPy

15:40 <antocuni> but I couldn't find any HPy by quickly browsing the code on github

15:52 <steve_s> They seem to use cffi: https://github.com/cirospaciari/socketify.py/blob/main/src/socketify/native.py

15:55 <steve_s> https://github.com/cirospaciari/socketify.py#dizzy-cffi-vs-cython-vs-hpy

15:55 <steve_s> > Cython performs really well on Python3 but really bad on PyPy3, CFFI are chosen for better support PyPy3 until we got our hands on an stable HPy integration.

16:40 <mattip> it was on hacker news a few weeks ago

16:48 <mattip> ahh, and again today

21:14 <Hodgestar> fangerer: I'm happy with #394.