<fangerer>
antocuni: Hodgestar: I'll prepare the `0.0.3` release this week. I create branch `release/0.0.3` right before we merged the HPyField PR. We also said that we should include the GitHub Actions changes. If you agree, I'll merge the GitHub Actions PR (and the one that removes Azure Pipelines) into the branch. Anything else we should have in the release?
<fangerer>
What else do I need to do? Probably write a short blog post, right?
<fangerer>
I guess the ´feature/doc-build-cleanup` branch would also make sense to be included in the release.
fijal has quit []
fijal has joined #hpy
<mattip>
hmm. I am releasing PyPy now with 0.0.2
<mattip>
release-v7.3.6rc1, so I guess if we get hpy0.0.3 into PyPy I can update the release candidate
<antocuni>
fangerer: yes, for 0.0.2 I created a release branch because I needed a place where to put a couple of fixes, so it seems a good idea to do the same for 0.0.3
<antocuni>
backporting gh actions sounds good, especially because this way we can try the automatic building/uploading of sdist and wheels to pypi
<fangerer>
okay, just finished backporting of `feature/doc-build-cleanup`
<fangerer>
GH Actions is next
<antocuni>
to use the automatic release process we probably need to set the pypi secrets in the github settings
<antocuni>
but I don't know the details
<antocuni>
I will be traveling and mostly offline from tomorrow until the 21st, but I think that you all have the necessary permissions to do this without me
<antocuni>
it might be a good idea to create a new user "hpy.wheelbuilder" or similar
<fangerer>
I'll give it a try, thanks for the hints.
<fangerer>
Since I just saw it: could you (or Matti or Simon) update the IRC channel hint on PyPI? It's still saying `IRC channel : #hpy on freenode.net`
<mattip>
I think that comes from the README.md
<mattip>
and will update when you make another release
<fangerer>
thanks
dalley has joined #hpy
mattip has left #hpy [Leaving]
<ronan>
fangerer: I'd like to get PR#231 in the release
<fangerer>
Okay, should be no problem. I'll backport it (and reach out to you if I have problems)
<Hodgestar>
antocuni, fangerer: These days you should not need a special user to upload to PyPI -- you can instead generate an API key, I think. Although having a special user that the API key lives under is perhaps not a terrible idea.
<Hodgestar>
fangerer: Thank you for doing 0.0.3. Agreed about including the GitHub Actions PR.
<Hodgestar>
fangerer: If you give your PyPI username, I will add you as a maintainer too (can't hurt to have more active people in that list).