04:07 <tmlind> arnd: the smartreflex patch is now merged both from santosh' pull request and mine, my pull request can be dropped if anything needs to be done

04:08 <tmlind> arnd: see notes in thread "[GIT PULL 2/3] Drop pm_runtime_irq_safe() for smartreflex for v5.15", that's the one that can be dropped if needed

06:46 <arnd> tmlind: ok, thanks for letting me know. Fortunately the merge happens to be the last on the branch, so I can simply pop it off. Sorry for missing the follow-up when I only looked at the pwclient output instead of the original email thread

06:47 <arnd> the extra commit will remain in linux-next until I regenerate the for-next branch, but it's now gone from arm/drivers, which will be sent in the merge window

08:45 <mmind00> robher: just for my peace of mind, are the two binding changes still somewhere on your list? https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/20210805025948.10900-2-ezequiel@collabora.com/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/20210805120107.27007-2-michael.riesch@wolfvision.net/ ... I guess the second doesn't matter as much, as it just mimics a bunch of defines for a new soc

08:50 <mmind00> robher: and I guess https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/20210726090355.1548483-1-heiko@sntech.de/ as well

12:09 <robher> mmind00: The first 2 are. The 3rd is not since I acked it. Do you want me to apply it instead?

20:51 <mmind00> robher: sure if that is possible (applying the pwm compatible) ... or I need to ping lag more ;-)